Literature DB >> 15734407

Acute hemodynamic benefit of left ventricular apex pacing in children.

Ward Y Vanagt1, Xander A Verbeek, Tammo Delhaas, Marc Gewillig, Luc Mertens, Patrick Wouters, Bart Meyns, Willem J Daenen, Frits W Prinzen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that pacing at the right ventricular apex acutely and chronically decreases left ventricular contractile function, this pacing site is still conventionally used in adults and children. Because animal studies showed beneficial effects of left ventricular pacing, we compared the hemodynamic performance of left ventricular apex, left ventricular free wall, and right ventricular apex pacing in children.
METHODS: Studies were performed in 10 children (median age, 2.5 years; range, 2 months to 17 years) undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease with normal systemic left ventricular anatomy and intraventricular conduction. High-fidelity left ventricular and arterial pressure measurements were performed during epicardial right ventricular apex and left ventricular apex and free wall pacing.
RESULTS: Left ventricular apex pacing increased the maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure and pulse pressure significantly relative to right ventricular apex pacing (by 7.7% +/- 7.2% and 7.7% +/- 7.0%, respectively) without changes in end-diastolic left ventricular pressure. Left ventricular free wall pacing did not significantly improve hemodynamics as compared with right ventricular apex pacing. The QRS duration was not different among pacing at the three sites.
CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study left ventricular apex pacing is hemodynamically superior to right ventricular apex and left ventricular free wall pacing in children. Therefore, the left ventricular apex appears a favorable pacing site after pediatric cardiac surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734407     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Global electrophysiological and hemodynamic assessment of ventricular pacing employing non-contact mapping.

Authors:  Nicholas D Skadsberg; Daniel R Kaiser; Trent M Fischer; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Evolution of paced QRS and QTc intervals in children with epicardial pacing leads.

Authors:  Maren Tomaske; Paul Harpes; Rene Prêtre; Ali Dodge-Khatami; Urs Bauersfeld
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Is left ventricular superior to right ventricular pacing in children with congenital or postoperative complete heart block?

Authors:  Ch Bharat Siddharth; Jay Relan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28

Review 4.  Chronic ventricular pacing in children: toward prevention of pacing-induced heart disease.

Authors:  Irene E van Geldorp; Ward Y Vanagt; Frits W Prinzen; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Predictors of left ventricular remodelling and failure in right ventricular pacing in the young.

Authors:  Roman A Gebauer; Viktor Tomek; Aida Salameh; Jan Marek; Václav Chaloupecký; Roman Gebauer; Tomás Matejka; Pavel Vojtovic; Jan Janousek
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Atrioventricular left ventricular apical pacing improves haemodynamic, rotational, and deformation variables in comparison to pacing at the lateral wall in intact myocardium: experimental study.

Authors:  Savvas Toumanidis; Anna Kaladaridou; Dimitrios Bramos; Elias Skaltsiotes; John Agrios; Constantinos Pamboucas; George Kottis; Anna Antoniou; Elektra Papadopoulou; Spyridon Moulopoulos
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.866

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.