Literature DB >> 15734073

Immunogenicity in mice of anthrax recombinant protective antigen in the presence of aluminum adjuvants.

Inge Berthold1, Maria-Luz Pombo, Leslie Wagner, Juan L Arciniega.   

Abstract

The only US-licensed anthrax vaccine for human use, as well as several experimental vaccines containing solely purified recombinant protective antigen (rPA), are formulated using aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3) as an adjuvant. It has been suggested that effective adjuvanticity of aluminum salts for protein antigens depends, at least partially, on the degree of adsorption of the antigen to the adjuvant. On the other hand, the ease of antigen desorption from the adjuvant in a quantitative fashion may facilitate the assessment of vaccine characteristics in the laboratory. In this regard, aluminum phosphate (AlPO4), although deemed a "weaker" adjuvant than Al(OH)3, appears superior to the latter. To investigate the possibility of formulating rPA vaccines with AlPO4, as well as the significance of the adsorption of this antigen to the aluminum salt for adjuvanticity, we studied the effect of AlPO4 and Al(OH)3 on the induction of anti-rPA antibodies in mice. In a first immunization experiment the adjuvanticity of AlPO4 combined with rPA was examined. Antibodies against rPA were measured using an ELISA. Results indicated that AlPO4 is able to significantly increase the antibody response to rPA, irrespective of its degree of adsorption to the adjuvant. Based on these results, in a second experiment mice were immunized twice, with different formulations of rPA containing either AlPO4 or Al(OH)3, and rPA-antibodies were measured using ELISA and an in vitro toxin neutralization assay. Comparable immune responses to rPA were obtained with both aluminum salts. Additionally, results with AlPO4 as adjuvant confirmed that, in this mouse model, binding of the protein to the adjuvant is not essential for adjuvanticity, whereas the amount of adjuvant has an influence on the antibody response induced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734073     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  21 in total

1.  Reduction of immunogenicity of anthrax vaccines subjected to thermal stress, as measured by a toxin neutralization assay.

Authors:  Juan Castelán-Vega; Laura Corvette; Lev Sirota; Juan Arciniega
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-12-08

2.  Structural and immunological analysis of anthrax recombinant protective antigen adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.

Authors:  Leslie Wagner; Anita Verma; Bruce D Meade; Karine Reiter; David L Narum; Rebecca A Brady; Stephen F Little; Drusilla L Burns
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-07-18

3.  Alum as an adjuvant for nanoparticle based vaccines: A case study with a hybrid nanoparticle-based nicotine vaccine.

Authors:  Yun Hu; Daniel Smith; Zongmin Zhao; Theresa Harmon; Paul R Pentel; Marion Ehrich; Chenming Zhang
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 4.  Advances in aluminum hydroxide-based adjuvant research and its mechanism.

Authors:  Peng He; Yening Zou; Zhongyu Hu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Adsorption of recombinant poxvirus L1-protein to aluminum hydroxide/CpG vaccine adjuvants enhances immune responses and protection of mice from vaccinia virus challenge.

Authors:  Yuhong Xiao; Yuhong Zeng; Edward Alexander; Shyam Mehta; Sangeeta B Joshi; George W Buchman; David B Volkin; C Russell Middaugh; Stuart N Isaacs
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Vaccines with aluminum-containing adjuvants: optimizing vaccine efficacy and thermal stability.

Authors:  Tanya Clapp; Paul Siebert; Dexiang Chen; LaToya Jones Braun
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Biophysical characterization and immunization studies of dominant negative inhibitor (DNI), a candidate anthrax toxin subunit vaccine.

Authors:  Vidyashankara Iyer; Lei Hu; Carole E Schanté; David Vance; Chrystal Chadwick; Nishant Kumar Jain; Robert N Brey; Sangeeta B Joshi; David B Volkin; Kiran K Andra; James G Bann; Nicholas J Mantis; C Russell Middaugh
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Considerable differences in vaccine immunogenicities and efficacies related to the diluent used for aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.

Authors:  Lin Lin; Ashraf S Ibrahim; Valentina Avanesian; John E Edwards; Yue Fu; Beverlie Baquir; Rebecca Taub; Brad Spellberg
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-01-09

9.  The mast cell activator compound 48/80 is safe and effective when used as an adjuvant for intradermal immunization with Bacillus anthracis protective antigen.

Authors:  Afton L McGowen; Laura P Hale; Christopher P Shelburne; Soman N Abraham; Herman F Staats
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Aluminum hydroxide nanoparticles show a stronger vaccine adjuvant activity than traditional aluminum hydroxide microparticles.

Authors:  Xinran Li; Abdulaziz M Aldayel; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.