A survey of open-access endoscopy in primary health care centres: outcome of gastric carcinoma patients diagnosed by general practitioners compared with hospital-referred endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: We examined open-access endoscopy service based on general practitioner endoscopists.
METHODS: We compared the survival of the gastric carcinoma patients originally diagnosed in health care centres by general practitioner endoscopists and hospital outpatient clinic by specialists.
RESULTS: A total of 159 gastric carcinoma cases diagnosed during 1996-2000 were included in to the present study. Of them, 58% (N = 92) and 42% (N = 67) were detected by general practitioners and specialists, respectively. We observed no difference in the mean age of patients (71.3 years versus 71.4 years, p = 0.97) and stage of tumours [15% (N = 14) versus 21% localised tumours (N = 14, p = 0.30)] between cases diagnosed by general practitioners and specialists. The number of patients who underwent radical extirpation were 14% (N = 13) and 19% (N = 13, p = 0.38), respectively. After a minimum follow-up of 3.5 years, 29 patients (18%) were alive. The mean survival time of hospital-diagnosed carcinoma patients was longer (23.6 months versus 18.7 months, p = 0.23). Eight patients had undergone hospital-referred gastroscopy less than 3 years before cancer diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, radical extirpation of carcinoma (odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.28) predicted survival; whereas age (odds ratio 1.03 per year, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.07 per year), female sex (odds ratio 1.785, 95% confidence interval 0.71-4.81) and the open-access endoscopy based on general practitioner endoscopists (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 0.60-3.65) predicted neither survival nor carcinoma-related death.
CONCLUSION: No significant difference was detected in the outcome of gastric cancer patients diagnosed in primary care centres by general practitioner endoscopists and in hospital outpatient clinic by specialists.