G Bischof1, H-J Rumpf, C Meyer, U Hapke, U John. 1. Medical University of Lübeck, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Federal Republic of Germany. gallus.bischof@ukl.uni-luebeck.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is well known that only a minority of alcohol-dependent subjects seek help and that the majority of alcohol-dependent individuals recover without utilization of formal help. Psychiatric comorbidity is highly prevalent among alcohol-dependent individuals. However, no data are available on the impact of psychiatric comorbidity on natural recovery. AIMS: To analyse the impact of non-psychotic psychiatric comorbid Axis I disorders on remission rate and utilization of formal help in alcohol-dependent individuals drawn from a representative general population sample in northern Germany (response rate: 70.2%, n = 4075). Psychiatric diagnoses and utilization of help were assessed in a personal interview using standardized instruments. One hundred and fifty-three life-time alcohol-dependent individuals were assessed, among whom 98 fulfilled the criteria for sustained long-term remission according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version II (DSM-IV) criteria. Any coincidence of DSM-IV non-psychotic Axis I disorders with alcohol dependence was counted as comorbidity. Comorbidity rate in the whole sample was 36.1%. RESULTS: The rate of individuals who remitted from alcohol dependence without formal help was 36.9% in the non-comorbid and 42.6% in the comorbid group. Utilization of formal help was unrelated to comorbidity. Dually diagnosed subjects without a history of help-seeking showed minor differences concerning reasons for not seeking help. Seeking help was not related to schooling, severity of dependence and gender. CONCLUSION: Data reveal that remission without formal help is equally prevalent among non-comorbid as among comorbid alcohol-dependent individuals. Axis I comorbidity is not related directly to utilization of alcohol-related help. Negative prognoses for untreated comorbid alcohol-dependent individuals are not justified from an epidemiological point of view.
BACKGROUND: It is well known that only a minority of alcohol-dependent subjects seek help and that the majority of alcohol-dependent individuals recover without utilization of formal help. Psychiatric comorbidity is highly prevalent among alcohol-dependent individuals. However, no data are available on the impact of psychiatric comorbidity on natural recovery. AIMS: To analyse the impact of non-psychotic psychiatric comorbid Axis I disorders on remission rate and utilization of formal help in alcohol-dependent individuals drawn from a representative general population sample in northern Germany (response rate: 70.2%, n = 4075). Psychiatric diagnoses and utilization of help were assessed in a personal interview using standardized instruments. One hundred and fifty-three life-time alcohol-dependent individuals were assessed, among whom 98 fulfilled the criteria for sustained long-term remission according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version II (DSM-IV) criteria. Any coincidence of DSM-IV non-psychotic Axis I disorders with alcohol dependence was counted as comorbidity. Comorbidity rate in the whole sample was 36.1%. RESULTS: The rate of individuals who remitted from alcohol dependence without formal help was 36.9% in the non-comorbid and 42.6% in the comorbid group. Utilization of formal help was unrelated to comorbidity. Dually diagnosed subjects without a history of help-seeking showed minor differences concerning reasons for not seeking help. Seeking help was not related to schooling, severity of dependence and gender. CONCLUSION: Data reveal that remission without formal help is equally prevalent among non-comorbid as among comorbid alcohol-dependent individuals. Axis I comorbidity is not related directly to utilization of alcohol-related help. Negative prognoses for untreated comorbid alcohol-dependent individuals are not justified from an epidemiological point of view.
Authors: U W Preuss; M Johann; C Fehr; G Koller; N Wodarz; V Hesselbrock; W M Wong; M Soyka Journal: Eur Addict Res Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Lynn Owens; Graham Butcher; Ian Gilmore; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; James Oyee; Liz Perkins; Tom Walley; Paula Williamson; Ken Wilson; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-07-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Song Yi Han; Maeng Je Cho; Seunghee Won; Jin Pyo Hong; Jae Nam Bae; Seong-Jin Cho; Jong-Ik Park; Jun-Young Lee; Hong Jin Jeon; Sung Man Chang Journal: Psychiatry Investig Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 2.505
Authors: Mary R Lee; Vignesh Sankar; Aaron Hammer; William G Kennedy; Jennifer J Barb; Philip G McQueen; Lorenzo Leggio Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2019-06-17