Literature DB >> 15733175

Laser lead extraction: is there a learning curve?

Nina Ghosh1, Raymond Yee, George J Klein, Mackenzie Quantz, Richard J Novick, Allan C Skanes, Andrew D Krahn.   

Abstract

Laser extraction of device leads offers an attractive alternative to countertraction and electrosurgical dissection sheath, potentially increasing efficacy and reducing complications. Wider adoption of this technology depends on relative ease of use. We report the experience of a new center to define the "learning curve." We performed 76 laser lead extractions in 75 patients (age 63 +/- 17 years, 59 male) from July 2001 to January 2004. Two experienced device implanters who were novice extractors underwent a 2-day site visit to a high volume extraction center for training. Lead extractions were performed in the operating room with immediate surgical backup. The indication for extraction was infection in 39 (systemic in 15), erosion or pain in 11, and lead related or debulking in 25. Complete removal was achieved in 139 of 145 leads (14 ICD, 131 pacemaker). Partial removal (<4 cm retained) was achieved in five leads (4%), and one lead could not be extracted. Complete success was 95% in the first third of patients, 94% in the second third, and 100% in the latter third. Fluoroscopy time fell from 19 +/- 22 minute in the first third of patients to 11 +/- 8 minute in the second third to 8 +/- 4 minute in the latter third (ANOVA P = 0.02). No major complications occurred. Local bleeding required minor left subclavian vein repair in two individuals. Symptomatic venous thrombosis occurred in 3 of the first 11 cases 1-21 days after extraction, but did not occur in the next 64 consecutive patients who received a 1-month anticoagulation regimen (27% vs 0%, P < 0.001). One patient developed venous thrombosis 3 weeks following cessation of warfarin therapy. Practice guidelines reasonably recommend appropriate training prior to independent performance of lead extraction. The current study suggests that experienced device implanters with appropriate operative backup taking a limited, but intensive training program can be safe and effective at lead extraction in a short time, in part a reflection of the improved technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15733175     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09368.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  [ICD lead defects: diagnosis and therapeutical options].

Authors:  Christian G Wollmann; Dirk Böcker; Andreas Löher; Hans H Scheld; Günter Breithardt; Rainer Gradaus
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-02-11

2.  Management of infections involving implanted cardiac electrophysiologic devices.

Authors:  Frédéric L Paulin; Lorne J Gula; Raymond Yee; Allan C Skanes; George J Klein; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-09

3.  Arrhythmia device lead extraction: factors that necessitate laser assistance.

Authors:  Lorne J Gula; Andrew D Krahn; Raymond Yee; Allan C Skanes; Nina Ghosh; George J Klein
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Use of vacuum-assisted aspiration for removal of vegetations during transvenous lead extraction.

Authors:  Balaji Krishnan; Jeffery Lassig; Calambur Narashiman; Jay Simonson; Jeffery Shultz
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-19

5.  A single-centre experience of over one thousand lead extractions.

Authors:  Charles Kennergren; Christian Bjurman; Roger Wiklund; Jakob Gäbel
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.214

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.