Literature DB >> 15732709

Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.

Ruth Filik1, Kevin B Paterson, Simon P Liversedge.   

Abstract

We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such as KeUy showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors, unless required by secondary tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15732709     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  4 in total

1.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Taking on semantic commitments, II: Collective versus distributive readings.

Authors:  L Frazier; J M Pacht; K Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-02-01

Review 3.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities.

Authors:  H S Kurtzman; M C MacDonald
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-09
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Scope processing in Chinese.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Liqun Gao
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-06-03

3.  Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Evidence for distributivity effects in comprehension.

Authors:  Nikole D Patson; Tessa Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Converging evidence for the processing costs associated with ambiguous quantifier comprehension.

Authors:  Corey T McMillan; Danielle Coleman; Robin Clark; Tsao-Wei Liang; Rachel G Gross; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-02

6.  Interpreting quantifier scope ambiguity: evidence of heuristic first, algorithmic second processing.

Authors:  Veena D Dwivedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.