Literature DB >> 15732703

Selective attention and asymmetry in the Müller-Lyer illusion.

John Predebon1.   

Abstract

Two experiments reexamined the effect of selective spatial attention on the magnitudes of the wings- in and wings-out forms of the Müller-Lyer (M-L) illusion and a version of the illusion in which the two forms are superimposed to produce a figure (XX) flanked at both ends by an X. For the XX figure, ignoring the outer wings produced significant underestimation of shaft length, whereas ignoring the inner wings had no significant effect. For the M-L figures, ignoring the wings was more effective in attenuating the magnitude of the wings-out than of the wings-in illusion. The results are discussed with reference to space-based approaches to visual attention and to claims that attentional modulation of illusion magnitudes implicates high-level or cognitive factors in the formation of the M-L illusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15732703     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

Review 1.  Objects and attention: the state of the art.

Authors:  B J Scholl
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

2.  The effects of varying fins in Müller-Lyer and Holding illusions.

Authors:  A Pressey; N S Martin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

3.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

4.  Explanation of the Müller-Lyer illusion: confusion theory examined.

Authors:  A Erlebacher; R Sekuler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-06

5.  The creation and reversal of the Müller-Lyer illusion through attentional manipulation.

Authors:  S Coren; C Porac
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  K Goryo; J O Robinson; J A Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  A Mueller-Lyer illusion induced by selective attention.

Authors:  Y Tsal
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1984-05

8.  Influence of color and luminance on the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  K J Sadza; C M de Weert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-03
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Decrement of the Müller-Lyer and Poggendorff illusions: the effects of inspection and practice.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-07-30

2.  Attentional control settings modulate susceptibility to the induced Roelofs effect.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lester; Paul Dassonville
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Left, right, left, right, eyes to the front! Müller-Lyer bias in grasping is not a function of hand used, hand preferred or visual hemifield, but foveation does matter.

Authors:  John van der Kamp; Matthieu M de Wit; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Personality Traits and Perception of Müller-Lyer Illusion in Male Chinese Military Soldiers and University Students.

Authors:  Yingchun Zhang; Jing Liu; Yongli Wang; Jingyi Huang; Lili Wei; Bingren Zhang; Wei Wang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 1.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.