Literature DB >> 15732692

Stimulus-response compatibility with wheel-rotation responses: will an incompatible response coding be used when a compatible coding is possible?

Robert W Proctor1, Dong-Yuan Debbie Wang, David F Pick.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted in which subjects responded to left-right tones with clockwise-counterclockwise rotations of a steering wheel using one of two stimulus-response assignments. When the hands were at the bottom of the wheel, where hand movement is opposite to wheel movement, subjects coded responses according to the frame that yielded a compatible mapping when the instructions did not emphasize either hand or wheel movements (Experiment 1). When instructions emphasized hand movements, responses were coded relative to the hand-referenced frame (Experiment 2), and when the wheel controlled a visual cursor, responses were coded relative to a cursor-referenced frame (Experiment 3). Coding with respect to these frames occurred even when the resulting mapping was incompatible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15732692     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  2 in total

1.  The Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Debbie Wang; Robert W Proctor; David F Pick
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  The lateral coding of rotations: a study of the simon effect with wheel-rotation responses.

Authors:  Y Guiard
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.328

  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Action induction by visual perception of rotational motion.

Authors:  Claudia Classen; Armin Kibele
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-11

2.  Multiple response codes play specific roles in response selection and inhibition under task switching.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner; Michel D Druey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-05-30

3.  Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects.

Authors:  Stefan Ladwig; Christine Sutter; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Similar Mechanisms of Movement Control in Target- and Effect-Directed Actions toward Spatial Goals?

Authors:  Andrea M Walter; Martina Rieger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-06

5.  Tactile stimulations and wheel rotation responses: toward augmented lane departure warning systems.

Authors:  Christophe Tandonnet; Borís Burle; Franck Vidal; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-01

6.  The stuff that motor chunks are made of: Spatial instead of motor representations?

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Eduard C Groen; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interaction of oculomotor and manual behavior: evidence from simulated driving in an approach-avoidance steering task.

Authors:  Norbert Schneider; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-06-13

8.  Action planning with two-handed tools.

Authors:  Arvid Herwig; Cristina Massen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-06

9.  Affective compatibility between stimuli and response goals: a primer for a new implicit measure of attitudes.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; Klaus Rothermund; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.