Literature DB >> 15732368

[Incidence of disability in housebound elderly people living in a rural community].

Misuzu Watanabe1, Takemasa Watanabe, Takamaro Matsuura, Keiko Kawamura, Koichi Kono.   

Abstract

This study aimed to explore whether being housebound is a risk factor for disabilities and whether low social communication increases incidence of disability in elderly people. A self-reported questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics was administered to 2,046 community-dwelling elderly people (aged 65 and older) in October 2000, and subjects were followed up until March 2003. All subjects were independent in activities of daily living. In this study, being housebound was defined on frequency of going out, with those who left the house once or less per week being classified as housebound. We further classified the housebound into four groups: I, going out alone is difficult but social communication occurs; II going out alone is difficult and no social communication occurs; III, going out alone is possible but not undertaken often, and some social communication occurs; and IV, going out alone is possible but seldom undertaken and no social communication occurs. In this population, overall prevalence of being housebound was 8.5%, and about half of those who were housebound fit the third classification. At the end of the follow-up period, 12.7% of subjects reported disabilities. The incidence of disability was higher in the housebound compared with the non-housebound. The incidence of disability by age was higher in housebound groups than in the non-housebound in elderly individuals aged under 85, but no significant differences were recognized in those aged over 85. In terms of housebound status, all housebound groups had higher levels of disability than the non-housebound. However, the groups without social communication (H and IV) exhibited higher incidence of disability than those with social communication (I and II). From the results obtained, we conclude that being housebound is a risk factor for disability in elderly individuals aged 65 to 85 years who are living independently, and that lower social communication also represents a risk factor for disability. This study appears to indicate that a frequency of going out of once or less a week is a valid guide for determination of housebound status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15732368     DOI: 10.3143/geriatrics.42.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi        ISSN: 0300-9173


  4 in total

1.  Childhood socioeconomic status and social integration in later life: Results of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Toyo Ashida; Takeo Fujiwara; Katsunori Kondo
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup.

Authors:  Toshiki Katsura; Megumi Fujimoto; Miho Shizawa; Akiko Hoshino; Kanae Usui; Eri Yokoyama; Mayumi Hara
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2017-11-30

3.  The development of a town of safety, security and health project in an area with a very high population aging rate: -the activities of a community salon on a shopping street and their assessment-.

Authors:  Akiko Hoshino; Kanae Usui; Toshiki Katsura
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2011-12-17

4.  Effects of Social Interaction and Depression on Homeboundness in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Living Alone.

Authors:  You-Ri Kim; Hye-Sun Jung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.