Literature DB >> 15731675

Two options for perforator flaps in the flank donor site: latissimus dorsi and thoracodorsal perforator flaps.

Jeong Tae Kim1.   

Abstract

Two types of perforators, septocutaneous and musculocutaneous, are found in the same donor site of the flank area, and two perforator flaps based on each perforator are clinically available. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish them from one another using different nomenclatures. Accordingly, the perforator flap based on a musculocutaneous perforator is named according to the name of the muscle perforated, the latissimus dorsi perforator flap, and the perforator flap based on a septocutaneous perforator, located between the serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi muscles, is named according to the name of the proximal vessel, the thoracodorsal perforator flap. In this series of 42 latissimus dorsi perforator flaps, flap size ranged from 5 x 3 cm to 20 x 15 cm, and two complications were observed: a marginal necrosis in an extremely large flap (26 x 12 cm) and a failure caused by infection. The thoracodorsal perforator flap was used in 14 cases, including two cases of chimeric composition. Flap size ranged from 4.5 x 3.5 to 18 x 15 cm, with no complications. In the two patterns of perforator flap that the author used, initial temporary flap congestion was observed in five latissimus dorsi perforator flap cases and two thoracodorsal perforator flap cases, when the flap was designed as a large flap or a less reliable perforator was selected. However, the congestion was not serious enough to cause flap necrosis. Several techniques, such as T anastomosis or inclusion of an additional perforator or a small portion of muscle, are recommended to prevent the initial flap congestion, especially when an unreliable perforator is inevitably used or when a flap larger than 20 cm long is required. A small portion of the muscle was included in six cases, when an unduly large or improperly long flap was planned. All of the flaps were successful and ranged from 22 x 7 to 15 x 28 cm, except for one case of distal flap necrosis in an extraordinarily large flap measuring 34 x 10 cm. Diverse selection of the perforator flap is one of the great advantages of the flank donor site, providing it with wider availability and more versatile composition for reconstruction or resurfacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15731675     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000152427.09893.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

Review 1.  Perforator Flap versus Conventional Flap.

Authors:  Jeong Tae Kim; Sang Wha Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Free serratus anterior artery perforator flap: a case report with an anatomic and radiological study.

Authors:  Serena Tamburino; Tiphaine Menez; Jérôme Laloze; Audrey Michot; Pierre Paillet; Rosario Emanuele Perrotta; Vincent Casoli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  [Application of anterior serratus branch of thoracodorsal vessel in repairing chest wall defect].

Authors:  Dajiang Song; Zan Li; Yixin Zhang; Bo Zhou; Chunliu Lü; Yuanyuan Tang; Liang Yi; Zhenhua Luo
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-08-15

4.  A Workhorse Flap for Covering Moderate-sized Defects after Breast-conserving Surgery: Supercharged Lateral Thoracodorsal Flap.

Authors:  Do Gon Kim; Dong Hun Choi; Joon Seok Lee; Jeong Woo Lee; Jeeyeon Lee; Ho Yong Park; Jung Dug Yang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-02-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.