Literature DB >> 15731672

A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty.

Kevin F O'Grady1, Achilleas Thoma, Arianna Dal Cin.   

Abstract

The main objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether the rates of complications are higher in large reductions (> or =1000 g per breast) as compared with smaller reductions (< or =999 g per breast) using the inferior pedicle technique. A retrospective chart review of 133 consecutive patients operated on between October of 2000 and March of 2002 was undertaken. Complication data were recorded and analyzed on a per-breast basis. Two hundred sixteen breasts had reductions of 999 g or less, whereas 50 breasts had reductions of 1000 g or more. The overall mean follow-up period was 152 days (range, 20 to 522 days). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of nipple necrosis, hematoma formation, seroma, delayed healing, culture-positive wound infection, fat necrosis, cyst formation, nipple sensation, or hypertrophic scarring between the large and small reductions. However, the rate of wound dehiscence was significantly lower in the smaller reduction group. The rates of wound dehiscence and hypertrophic scarring were also significantly lower in patients who had received at least 5 days of postoperative antibiotics. A statistically significant difference was also reported for clinical wound infection (p < 0.0005). Body mass index had no statistically significant effect on the rate of nipple necrosis, hematoma formation, fat necrosis, cyst formation, nipple sensation, or hypertrophic scarring. However, body mass index had a statistically significant effect on delayed healing, wound dehiscence, and culture-positive wound infection. A higher mean body mass index predicted a delayed healing, wound dehiscence, and infection. The inferior pedicle technique is a safe method of breast reduction regardless of degree of parenchymal resection. However, the use of postoperative antibiotics for at least 5 days is recommended to reduce rates of wound dehiscence and improve postoperative scarring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15731672     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000152428.43300.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in breast reduction surgery.

Authors:  Rodger Shortt; Michael J Cooper; Forough Farrokhyar; James Bain
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Pedicle viability as the determinant factor for conversion to free nipple graft.

Authors:  Aa Al-Shaham
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

3.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 4973 Patients in China.

Authors:  Lingya Zhang; Jinlong Zheng; Jingpeng Mu; Yunqian Gao; Gehong Li
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Innovative Application of Three-Dimensional-Printed Breast Model-Aided Reduction Mammaplasty.

Authors:  Shaoheng Xiong; Bei E; Zhaoxiang Zhang; Jiezhang Tang; Xiangke Rong; Haibo Gong; Chenggang Yi
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Wound infections in body contouring mastopexy with breast reduction after laparoscopic adjustable gastric bandings: the role of smoking.

Authors:  G Gravante; A Araco; R Sorge; F Araco; D Delogu; V Cervelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Unfavourable results following reduction mammoplasty.

Authors:  Lakshmi Saleem; Jerry R John
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05

Review 7.  Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty pedicles and skin resection patterns.

Authors:  Corrine Wong; Megan Vucovich; Rod Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-09-08

8.  Effect of Obesity on Complications in Short-Scar Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 236 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Eleanor Rose Goldwasser Tomczyk; Ava Chappell; Nathaniel Erskine; Mustafa Akyurek
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  Superiomedial Pedicle Breast Reduction for Gigantic Breast Hypertrophy: Experience in 341 Breasts and Suggested Safety Modifications.

Authors:  Roei Singolda; Gal Bracha; Tariq Zoabi; Arik Zaretski; Amir Inbal; Eyal Gur; Yoav Barnea; Ehud Arad
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Nipple sparing mastectomy: does breast morphological factor related to necrotic complications?

Authors:  Prakasit Chirappapha; Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Francesca De Lorenzi; Cristina Garusi; Stefano Martella; Benedetta Barbieri; Alessandra Gottardi; Manconi Andrea; Lomeo Giuseppe; Alaa Hamza; Visnu Lohsiriwat
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.