OBJECTIVES: We and others have shown that B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells (ALL) stimulated with CD40 ligand become efficient antigen-presenting cells (APC) capable of expanding autologous, tumor-specific T cells from patients. Translation of these preclinical findings to a novel treatment strategy required four separate issues to be determined: (1) if a CD40-ALL vaccine could be generated for clinical use; (2) whether clinical translation could be achieved; (3) whether the vaccination was safe; and (4) whether a window of time could be identified that would optimize the efficacy of vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with relapsed/refractory ALL were enrolled in a phase I trial of vaccination with autologous CD40-ALL. Immunologic reconstitution was measured in a separate cohort of 23 patients with newly diagnosed ALL. RESULTS: We successfully prepared autologous vaccines for all nine patients in the phase I trial. CD40-ALL were potent APC, capable of stimulating allogeneic and peptide-specific T cells in vitro. Two patients were vaccinated without adverse events. Five patients died or progressed before vaccination, suggesting that rapid disease progression limits vaccination in patients with relapse disease, thus limiting clinical translation. We therefore sought to identify a window of time for vaccination during which this approach might be feasible. To achieve this end, we evaluated immunological reconstitution in newly diagnosed patients with ALL patients. Despite recovery of myelopoiesis, most patients had profound defects in T, B, and natural killer (NK) cell numbers that failed to recover at any point during therapy. CONCLUSION: Autologous tumor vaccination at a time of ALL relapse is not feasible. Alternative strategies for immunotherapy of ALL may require ex vivo generation of antigen specific T cells and adoptive therapy.
OBJECTIVES: We and others have shown that B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells (ALL) stimulated with CD40 ligand become efficient antigen-presenting cells (APC) capable of expanding autologous, tumor-specific T cells from patients. Translation of these preclinical findings to a novel treatment strategy required four separate issues to be determined: (1) if a CD40-ALL vaccine could be generated for clinical use; (2) whether clinical translation could be achieved; (3) whether the vaccination was safe; and (4) whether a window of time could be identified that would optimize the efficacy of vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with relapsed/refractory ALL were enrolled in a phase I trial of vaccination with autologous CD40-ALL. Immunologic reconstitution was measured in a separate cohort of 23 patients with newly diagnosed ALL. RESULTS: We successfully prepared autologous vaccines for all nine patients in the phase I trial. CD40-ALL were potent APC, capable of stimulating allogeneic and peptide-specific T cells in vitro. Two patients were vaccinated without adverse events. Five patients died or progressed before vaccination, suggesting that rapid disease progression limits vaccination in patients with relapse disease, thus limiting clinical translation. We therefore sought to identify a window of time for vaccination during which this approach might be feasible. To achieve this end, we evaluated immunological reconstitution in newly diagnosed patients with ALL patients. Despite recovery of myelopoiesis, most patients had profound defects in T, B, and natural killer (NK) cell numbers that failed to recover at any point during therapy. CONCLUSION: Autologous tumor vaccination at a time of ALL relapse is not feasible. Alternative strategies for immunotherapy of ALL may require ex vivo generation of antigen specific T cells and adoptive therapy.
Authors: Alan S Wayne; Robert J Kreitman; Harry W Findley; Glen Lew; Cynthia Delbrook; Seth M Steinberg; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; David J Fitzgerald; Ira Pastan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: W Nicholas Haining; Donna S Neuberg; Heather L Keczkemethy; John W Evans; Stephen Rivoli; Rebecca Gelman; Howard M Rosenblatt; William T Shearer; Javier Guenaga; Daniel C Douek; Lewis B Silverman; Stephen E Sallan; Eva C Guinan; Lee M Nadler Journal: Blood Date: 2005-05-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Raphaël F Rousseau; Ettore Biagi; Aurélie Dutour; Eric S Yvon; Michael P Brown; Tiffany Lin; Zhuyong Mei; Bambi Grilley; Edwina Popek; Helen E Heslop; Adrian P Gee; Robert A Krance; Uday Popat; George Carrum; Judith F Margolin; Malcolm K Brenner Journal: Blood Date: 2005-10-25 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: David L Porter; Edwin P Alyea; Joseph H Antin; Marcos DeLima; Eli Estey; J H Frederik Falkenburg; Nancy Hardy; Nicolaus Kroeger; Jose Leis; John Levine; David G Maloney; Karl Peggs; Jacob M Rowe; Alan S Wayne; Sergio Giralt; Michael R Bishop; Koen van Besien Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Alix E Seif; David M Barrett; Michael Milone; Valerie I Brown; Stephan A Grupp; Gregor S D Reid Journal: Blood Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Haiying Qin; Kazusa Ishii; Sang Nguyen; Paul P Su; Chad R Burk; Bong-Hyun Kim; Brynn B Duncan; Samikasha Tarun; Nirali N Shah; M Eric Kohler; Terry J Fry Journal: Blood Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 22.113