Literature DB >> 15730391

Ex vivo induction of viral antigen-specific CD8 T cell responses using mRNA-electroporated CD40-activated B cells.

G A Van den Bosch1, P Ponsaerts, G Nijs, M Lenjou, G Vanham, D R Van Bockstaele, Z N Berneman, V F I Van Tendeloo.   

Abstract

Cell-based immunotherapy, in which antigen-loaded antigen-presenting cells (APC) are used to elicit T cell responses, has become part of the search for alternative cancer and infectious disease treatments. Here, we report on the feasibility of using mRNA-electroporated CD40-activated B cells (CD40-B cells) as alternative APC for the ex vivo induction of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cell responses. The potential of CD40-B cells as APC is reflected in their phenotypic analysis, showing a polyclonal, strongly activated B cell population with high expression of MHC and co-stimulatory molecules. Flow cytometric analysis of EGFP expression 24 h after EGFP mRNA-electroporation showed that CD40-B cells can be RNA transfected with high gene transfer efficiency. No difference in transfection efficiency or postelectroporation viability was observed between CD40-B cells and monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC). Our first series of experiments show clearly that peptide-pulsed CD40-B cells are able to (re)activate both CD8+ and CD4(+) T cells against influenza and cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigens. To demonstrate the ability of viral antigen mRNA-electroporated CD40-B cells to induce virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses, these antigen-loaded cells were co-cultured in vitro with autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) for 7 days followed by analysis of T cell antigen-specificity. These experiments show that CD40-B cells electroporated with influenza M1 mRNA or with CMV pp65 mRNA are able to activate antigen-specific interferon (IFN)-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells. These findings demonstrate that mRNA-electroporated CD40-B cells can be used as alternative APC for the induction of antigen-specific (memory) CD8(+) T cell responses, which might overcome some of the drawbacks inherent to DC immunotherapy protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15730391      PMCID: PMC1809302          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02733.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


  31 in total

Review 1.  Dendritic cells: a journey from laboratory to clinic.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cerundolo; Ian F Hermans; Mariolina Salio
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Regression of human metastatic renal cell carcinoma after vaccination with tumor cell-dendritic cell hybrids.

Authors:  A Kugler; G Stuhler; P Walden; G Zöller; A Zobywalski; P Brossart; U Trefzer; S Ullrich; C A Müller; V Becker; A J Gross; B Hemmerlein; L Kanz; G A Müller; R H Ringert
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Release of infectious Epstein-Barr virus by transformed marmoset leukocytes.

Authors:  G Miller; M Lipman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Cancer immunotherapy using RNA-loaded dendritic cells.

Authors:  P Ponsaerts; V F I Van Tendeloo; Z N Berneman
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  RNA-transfected CD40-activated B cells induce functional T-cell responses against viral and tumor antigen targets: implications for pediatric immunotherapy.

Authors:  Christina M Coughlin; Barbara A Vance; Stephan A Grupp; Robert H Vonderheide
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  In vitro human memory CD8 T cell expansion in response to cytomegalovirus requires CD4+ T cell help.

Authors:  Janelle R Salkowitz; Scott F Sieg; Clifford V Harding; Michael M Lederman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 7.  Dendritic cells: antigen presentation, accessory function and clinical relevance.

Authors:  R M Steinman; M Witmer-Pack; K Inaba
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Messenger RNA-electroporated dendritic cells presenting MAGE-A3 simultaneously in HLA class I and class II molecules.

Authors:  Aude Bonehill; Carlo Heirman; Sandra Tuyaerts; Annelies Michiels; Karine Breckpot; Francis Brasseur; Yi Zhang; Pierre Van Der Bruggen; Kris Thielemans
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Dendritic cells pulsed with RNA are potent antigen-presenting cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  D Boczkowski; S K Nair; D Snyder; E Gilboa
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Vaccination with mage-3A1 peptide-pulsed mature, monocyte-derived dendritic cells expands specific cytotoxic T cells and induces regression of some metastases in advanced stage IV melanoma.

Authors:  B Thurner; I Haendle; C Röder; D Dieckmann; P Keikavoussi; H Jonuleit; A Bender; C Maczek; D Schreiner; P von den Driesch; E B Bröcker; R M Steinman; A Enk; E Kämpgen; G Schuler
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1999-12-06       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The Emerging Role of In Vitro-Transcribed mRNA in Adoptive T Cell Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jessica B Foster; David M Barrett; Katalin Karikó
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Adoptive transfer of tumor reactive B cells confers host T-cell immunity and tumor regression.

Authors:  Qiao Li; Xiangming Lao; Qin Pan; Ning Ning; Ji Yet; Yingxin Xu; Shengping Li; Alfred E Chang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  B lymphocytes as effector cells in the immunotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  Jukes P Namm; Qiao Li; Xiangming Lao; David M Lubman; Jintang He; Yashu Liu; Jianhui Zhu; Shuang Wei; Alfred E Chang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Stimulation by means of dendritic cells followed by Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cells as antigen-presenting cells is more efficient than dendritic cells alone in inducing Aspergillus f16-specific cytotoxic T cell responses.

Authors:  F Zhu; G Ramadan; B Davies; D A Margolis; C A Keever-Taylor
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  The early kinetics of cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses are not affected by antigen load or the absence of perforin or gamma interferon.

Authors:  Daniel M Andrews; Christopher E Andoniou; Peter Fleming; Mark J Smyth; Mariapia A Degli-Esposti
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  B cell-regulated immune responses in tumor models and cancer patients.

Authors:  Carlo Fremd; Florian Schuetz; Christof Sohn; Philipp Beckhove; Christoph Domschke
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.110

7.  Langerhans-type and monocyte-derived human dendritic cells have different susceptibilities to mRNA electroporation with distinct effects on maturation and activation: implications for immunogenicity in dendritic cell-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  David J Chung; Emanuela Romano; Katherine B Pronschinske; Justin A Shyer; Milena Mennecozzi; Erin T St Angelo; James W Young
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 8.  Role of B cells as antigen presenting cells.

Authors:  Ichwaku Rastogi; Donghwan Jeon; Jena E Moseman; Anusha Muralidhar; Hemanth K Potluri; Douglas G McNeel
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 8.786

9.  Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells.

Authors:  Christina Susanne Mullins; Tabea Wegner; Ernst Klar; Carl-Friedrich Classen; Michael Linnebacher
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-24

Review 10.  Antibody-independent functions of B cells during viral infections.

Authors:  Vinit Upasani; Izabela Rodenhuis-Zybert; Tineke Cantaert
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 6.823

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.