OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether selective digestive decontamination (SDD) reduces mortality from any cause, and the incidence of pneumonia among patients with severe burns. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SDD is a prophylactic strategy to reduce infectious morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Two meta-analyses and a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated a mortality reduction varying between 20% and 40%. But this technique has never been properly evaluated in severely burned patients. METHODS: The design of this single-center trial was randomized, double blind, placebo controlled. Patients with burns > or =20% of total body surfaceand/or suspected inhalation injury were enrolled and assigned to receive SDD or placebo for the total duration of treatment in the burn intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS:One hundred seventeen patients were randomized and 107 were analyzed (53 in the SDD group and 54 in the placebo group). The ICU mortality was 27.8% in the placebo group and 9.4% in the SDD group in the burn ICU. Treatment with SDD was associated with a significant reduction in mortality both in the burn ICU (risk ratio 0.25; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76) and in the hospital (risk ratio 0.28; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.80), following adjustment for predicted mortality. The incidence of pneumonia was significantly higher in the placebo group: 30.8 and 17.0 pneumonias per 1000 ventilation days (P = 0.03) in placebo and SDD group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SDD reduces mortality and pneumonia incidence in patients with severe burns.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether selective digestive decontamination (SDD) reduces mortality from any cause, and the incidence of pneumonia among patients with severe burns. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SDD is a prophylactic strategy to reduce infectious morbidity and mortality in critically illpatients. Two meta-analyses and a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated a mortality reduction varying between 20% and 40%. But this technique has never been properly evaluated in severely burned patients. METHODS: The design of this single-center trial was randomized, double blind, placebo controlled. Patients with burns > or =20% of total body surface and/or suspected inhalation injury were enrolled and assigned to receive SDD or placebo for the total duration of treatment in the burn intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients were randomized and 107 were analyzed (53 in the SDD group and 54 in the placebo group). The ICU mortality was 27.8% in the placebo group and 9.4% in the SDD group in the burn ICU. Treatment with SDD was associated with a significant reduction in mortality both in the burn ICU (risk ratio 0.25; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76) and in the hospital (risk ratio 0.28; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.80), following adjustment for predicted mortality. The incidence of pneumonia was significantly higher in the placebo group: 30.8 and 17.0 pneumonias per 1000 ventilation days (P = 0.03) in placebo and SDD group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SDD reduces mortality and pneumonia incidence in patients with severe burns.
Authors: M Ruiz; A Torres; S Ewig; M A Marcos; A Alcón; R Lledó; M A Asenjo; A Maldonaldo Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: M A de La Cal; E Cerdá; P García-Hierro; L Lorente; M Sánchez-Concheiro; C Díaz; H K van Saene Journal: Chest Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: M Ferrer; A Torres; J González; J Puig de la Bellacasa; M el-Ebiary; M Roca; J M Gatell; R Rodriguez-Roisin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1994-03-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Enrique Cerdá; Ana Abella; Miguel A de la Cal; José A Lorente; Paloma García-Hierro; Hendrick K F van Saene; Inmaculada Alía; Ainhoa Aranguren Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alexandra Heininger; Elisabeth Meyer; Frank Schwab; Matthias Marschal; Klaus Unertl; Wolfgang A Krueger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Anne Marie G A de Smet; Titia E M Hopmans; Albertus L C Minderhoud; Hetty E M Blok; Annelies Gossink-Franssen; Alexandra T Bernards; Marc J M Bonten Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 17.440