BACKGROUND: Many academic medical centers employ nurse practitioners as substitutes to provide care normally supplied by house staff. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in a subacute medical intensive care unit of patients managed by a team consisting of either an acute care nurse practitioner and an attending physician or an attending physician and critical care/pulmonary fellows. METHODS: During a 31-month period, in 7-month blocks of time, 526 consecutive patients admitted to the unit for more than 24 hours were managed by one or the other of the teams. Patients managed by the 2 teams were compared for a variety of outcomes. RESULTS: Patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ significantly for any workload, demographic, or medical condition variable. The patients also did not differ in readmission to the high acuity unit (P = .25) or subacute unit (P = .44) within 72 hours of discharge or in mortality with (P = .25) or without (P = .89) treatment limitations. Among patients who had multiple weaning trials, patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ in length of stay in the subacute unit (P = .42), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .18), weaning status at time of discharge from the unit (P = .80), or disposition (P = .28). Acute Physiology Scores were significantly different over time (P = .046). Patients managed by the fellows had more reintubations (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a subacute intensive care unit, management by the 2 teams produced equivalent outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Many academic medical centers employ nurse practitioners as substitutes to provide care normally supplied by house staff. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in a subacute medical intensive care unit of patients managed by a team consisting of either an acute care nurse practitioner and an attending physician or an attending physician and critical care/pulmonary fellows. METHODS: During a 31-month period, in 7-month blocks of time, 526 consecutive patients admitted to the unit for more than 24 hours were managed by one or the other of the teams. Patients managed by the 2 teams were compared for a variety of outcomes. RESULTS:Patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ significantly for any workload, demographic, or medical condition variable. The patients also did not differ in readmission to the high acuity unit (P = .25) or subacute unit (P = .44) within 72 hours of discharge or in mortality with (P = .25) or without (P = .89) treatment limitations. Among patients who had multiple weaning trials, patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ in length of stay in the subacute unit (P = .42), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .18), weaning status at time of discharge from the unit (P = .80), or disposition (P = .28). Acute Physiology Scores were significantly different over time (P = .046). Patients managed by the fellows had more reintubations (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a subacute intensive care unit, management by the 2 teams produced equivalent outcomes.
Authors: Brenda Nevidjon; Paula Rieger; Cynthia Miller Murphy; Margaret Quinn Rosenzweig; Michele R McCorkle; Kristen Baileys Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Matthew J Trombley; Andrea Hassol; Jennifer T Lloyd; Timothy G Buchman; Allison F Marier; Alan White; Erin Colligan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Walter A Boyle; David J Murray; Mary Beth Beyatte; Justin G Knittel; Paul W Kerby; Julie Woodhouse; John R Boulet Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Philippe Seguin; Bruno Laviolle; Sonia Isslame; Aurélie Coué; Yannick Mallédant Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Susan M Sereika; Judith A Tate; Dana DiVirgilio-Thomas; Leslie A Hoffman; Valerie A Swigart; Lauren Broyles; Tricia Roesch; Mary Beth Happ Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Mary Beth Happ; Judith A Tate; Valerie A Swigart; Dana DiVirgilio-Thomas; Leslie A Hoffman Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: David L Carpenter; Sara R Gregg; Daniel S Owens; Timothy G Buchman; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 9.097