Literature DB >> 1572836

Optimization of 3D radiation therapy with both physical and biological end points and constraints.

A Niemierko1, M Urie, M Goitein.   

Abstract

A new optimization model is described and its clinical usefulness is demonstrated. The optimization technique was developed to allow computer optimization of 3-dimensional radiation therapy plans with biological models of tumor and normal tissue response to radiation as well as with scores based on physical dose. The emphasis was placed on the optimization model, which should describe, as closely as possible, the goal of the radiation treatment, which is eradication of the tumor while sparing normal tissues. Since the statement of the goals may vary from case to case, a technique that allows a variety of objective functions and types of constraints was developed. The optimization algorithm is capable of handling nonlinear and even discrete score (objective) functions and constraints and effectively explores the vast space of feasible solutions in a relatively short time (minutes of MicroVax 3200 CPU time). An example of computer optimization of radiation therapy of a chordoma of the sphenoid bone using x-ray and proton beams is shown and compared with the best plans achieved by an experienced planner. Directions for future development of the algorithm, allowing optimization of beam orientation, are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1572836     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90548-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  [Inverse radiotherapy planning].

Authors:  W Schlegel; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Postoperative Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Emma Holliday; Onita Bhattasali; Merrill S Kies; Ehab Hanna; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; William H Morrison; G Brandon Gunn; Jack Phan; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-03-24

3.  An NTCP Analysis of Urethral Complications from Low Doserate Mono- and Bi-Radionuclide Brachytherapy.

Authors:  V E Nuttens; A E Nahum; S Lucas
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-07-06

4.  A comparison of dose-response characteristics of four NTCP models using outcomes of radiation-induced optic neuropathy and retinopathy.

Authors:  Vitali Moiseenko; William Y Song; Loren K Mell; Niranjan Bhandare
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Clinical implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters.

Authors:  Antonella Bufacchi; Barbara Nardiello; Roberto Capparella; Luisa Begnozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Biological optimization for mediastinal lymphoma radiotherapy - a preliminary study.

Authors:  Laura Ann Rechner; Arezoo Modiri; Line Bjerregaard Stick; Maja V Maraldo; Marianne C Aznar; Stephanie R Rice; Amit Sawant; Søren M Bentzen; Ivan Richter Vogelius; Lena Specht
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.089

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.