Literature DB >> 15728047

Threshold current of an insulated needle in the intrathecal space in pediatric patients.

Ban C H Tsui1, Alese M Wagner, Kirsten Cunningham, Shirley Perry, Sunil Desai, Robert Seal.   

Abstract

A threshold current of <1 mA has been suggested to be sufficient to produce a motor response to electrical stimulation in the intrathecal space. We designed this study to determine the threshold current needed to elicit motor activity for an insulated needle in the intrathecal space. Twenty pediatric patients aged 7.3 +/- 3.9 yr scheduled for lumbar puncture were recruited. After sedation with propofol, patients were turned to the lateral position and an 18-gauge or 20-gauge introducer needle was placed at the L4-5 level through which an insulated 24-gauge Pajunck unipolar needle (with a Sprotte tip and stylet) was inserted. The needle was advanced into the intrathecal space as suggested by the presence of a "pop." At this point, a nerve stimulator was attached to the insulated needle and the current was gradually increased until motor activity was evident. The needle hub was checked for cerebrospinal fluid. If cerebrospinal fluid was not present, the needle was advanced further until cerebrospinal fluid was present. The threshold current was retested. The mean current in the intrathecal space required to elicit a motor response was 0.6 +/- 0.3 mA (range, 0.1-1 mA). In 19 patients, the twitches were observed at the L4-5 myotomes and 1 patient had twitches at L2. Twitches were observed unilaterally in 19 children and bilaterally in one child. This confirms the hypothesis that the threshold current in the intrathecal space is <1 mA and that it differs significantly from the threshold currents reported for electrical stimulation in the epidural space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15728047     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143953.31973.5F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

Review 1.  Innovative approaches to neuraxial blockade in children: the introduction of epidural nerve root stimulation and ultrasound guidance for epidural catheter placement.

Authors:  Ban C H Tsui
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  "Dry tap" during spinal anaesthesia turns out to be epidural abscess.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar Sahu; Vinca Kaul; Reena Parampill
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-05

3.  Recent developments in paediatric neuraxial blocks.

Authors:  Vrushali Chandrashekhar Ponde
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Recent trends in paediatric regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  Vrushali Ponde
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-09

5.  Minimum current requirement for confirming the localization of an epiradicular catheter placement.

Authors:  Ji Seon Jeong; Jae Chol Shim; Jae Hang Shim; Dong Won Kim; Min Serk Kang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.