Literature DB >> 15727489

Pharmacogenomics and the drug discovery pipeline: when should it be implemented?

Michelle A Penny1, Duncan McHale.   

Abstract

One of the key factors in developing improved medicines lies in understanding the molecular basis of the complex diseases we treat. Investigation of genetic associations with disease utilizing advances in linkage disequilibrium-based whole genome association strategies will provide novel targets for therapy and define relevant pathways contributing to disease pathogenesis. Genetic studies in conjunction with gene expression, proteomic, and metabonomic analyses provide a powerful tool to identify molecular subtypes of disease. Using these molecular data, pharmacogenomics has the potential to impact on the drug discovery and development process at many stages of the pipeline, contributing to both target identification and increased confidence in the therapeutic rationale. This is exemplified by the identified association of 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (ALOX5AP/FLAP) with increased risk of myocardial infarction, and of the chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) with HIV infection and therapy. Pharmacogenomics has already been used in oncology to demonstrate that molecular data facilitates assessment of disease heterogeneity, and thus identification of molecular markers of response to drugs such as imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) and trastuzumab (Herceptin). Knowledge of genetic variation in a target allows early assessment of the clinical significance of polymorphism through the appropriate design of preclinical studies and use of relevant animal models. A focussed pharmacogenomic strategy at the preclinical phase of drug development will produce data to inform the pharmacogenomic plan for exploratory and full development of compounds. Opportunities post-approval show the value of large well-characterized data sets for a systematic assessment of the contribution of genetic determinants to adverse drug reactions and efficacy. The availability of genomic samples in large phase IV trials also provides a valuable resource for further understanding the molecular basis of disease heterogeneity, providing data that feeds back into the drug discovery process in target identification and validation for the next generation of improved medicines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15727489     DOI: 10.2165/00129785-200505010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1175-2203


  8 in total

1.  The International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen): an initiative by the NIMH and IGSLI to study the genetic basis of response to lithium treatment.

Authors:  Thomas G Schulze; Martin Alda; Mazda Adli; Nirmala Akula; Raffaella Ardau; Elise T Bui; Caterina Chillotti; Sven Cichon; Piotr Czerski; Maria Del Zompo; Sevilla D Detera-Wadleigh; Paul Grof; Oliver Gruber; Ryota Hashimoto; Joanna Hauser; Rebecca Hoban; Nakao Iwata; Layla Kassem; Tadafumi Kato; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Sebastian Kliwicki; John R Kelsoe; Ichiro Kusumi; Gonzalo Laje; Susan G Leckband; Mirko Manchia; Glenda Macqueen; Takuya Masui; Norio Ozaki; Roy H Perlis; Andrea Pfennig; Paola Piccardi; Sara Richardson; Guy Rouleau; Andreas Reif; Janusz K Rybakowski; Johanna Sasse; Johannes Schumacher; Giovanni Severino; Jordan W Smoller; Alessio Squassina; Gustavo Turecki; L Trevor Young; Takeo Yoshikawa; Michael Bauer; Francis J McMahon
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.328

2.  Health care reform: how personalized medicine could help bundling of care for liver diseases.

Authors:  Lopa Mishra
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Systematic identification of pharmacogenomics information from clinical trials.

Authors:  Jiao Li; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Clinical Genomics, and Pharmacogenomics Approaches in Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Habiba Abdelhalim; Asude Berber; Mudassir Lodi; Rihi Jain; Achuth Nair; Anirudh Pappu; Kush Patel; Vignesh Venkat; Cynthia Venkatesan; Raghu Wable; Matthew Dinatale; Allyson Fu; Vikram Iyer; Ishan Kalove; Marc Kleyman; Joseph Koutsoutis; David Menna; Mayank Paliwal; Nishi Patel; Thirth Patel; Zara Rafique; Rothela Samadi; Roshan Varadhan; Shreyas Bolla; Sreya Vadapalli; Zeeshan Ahmed
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Is the use of sentient animals in basic research justifiable?

Authors:  Ray Greek; Jean Greek
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.464

6.  The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: the result is more animal-based research.

Authors:  Mark J Rice
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.464

7.  Representation of target-bound drugs by computed conformers: implications for conformational libraries.

Authors:  Stefan Günther; Christian Senger; Elke Michalsky; Andrean Goede; Robert Preissner
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Precision medicine: from pharmacogenomics to pharmacoproteomics.

Authors:  Allison B Chambliss; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.988

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.