Literature DB >> 15727295

Environmental benchmarks vs. ecological benchmarks for assessment and monitoring in Canada: is there a difference?

Yolanda F Wiersma1.   

Abstract

Environmental benchmarks are widely used in Canadian environmental assessment as a standard against which to monitor air or water quality in response to human activities in the environment. Recent work in Canada has developed the concept of ecological benchmarks as a complement to environmental benchmarks. However, implementation of ecological benchmarks may be challenging. This paper presents an analogy between ecological benchmarks and the more commonly used environmental benchmarks, as an attempt to increase understanding and use of ecological benchmarks in resource management, assessment, and monitoring. Ecological benchmarks, and their corresponding indicators, will be challenging to identify and use. However, through the use of the principles of adaptive management, effective ecological indicators and benchmarks can be established. Although it is essential that ecological benchmarks are site-specific, the analogy and general principles outlined here are applicable to assessment and monitoring in any part of the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15727295     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-7055-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  Defining acceptable levels for ecological indicators: an approach for considering social values.

Authors:  Robyn L Smyth; Mary C Watzin; Robert E Manning
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Integrating sentinel watershed-systems into the monitoring and assessment of Minnesota's (USA) waters quality.

Authors:  J A Magner; K N Brooks
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Uncovering regional variability in disturbance trends between parks and greater park ecosystems across Canada (1985-2015).

Authors:  Douglas K Bolton; Nicholas C Coops; Txomin Hermosilla; Michael A Wulder; Joanne C White; Colin J Ferster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Conservation planning integrating natural disturbances: Estimating minimum reserve sizes for an insect disturbance in the boreal forest of eastern Canada.

Authors:  Marc Edwards; Kim Lisgo; Shawn Leroux; Meg Krawchuk; Steve Cumming; Fiona Schmiegelow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.