Literature DB >> 15726657

No relevant effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on cytochrome P450 3A metabolism in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Karin Dilger1, Annette Denk, Malte H J Heeg, Ulrich Beuers.   

Abstract

Induction of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) has been suggested as a mechanism of action of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in cholestasis. CYP3A is of key importance in human drug metabolism, being involved in presystemic extraction of more than 50% of all drugs currently available and of various endogenous compounds. Therefore, we compared the induction potential of UDCA with that of the prototypical inducer rifampicin in a human model study with the CYP3A substrates budesonide and cortisol. Twelve patients with early-stage primary biliary cirrhosis and eight healthy volunteers were treated with UDCA (15 mg/kg daily) for 3 weeks and subsequently with rifampicin (600 mg/d) for 1 week. Extensive pharmacokinetic profiling of oral budesonide (3 mg) was performed by determination of budesonide and phase I metabolites (6beta-hydroxybudesonide, 16alpha-hydroxyprednisolone) in plasma and urine at baseline and at the end of each treatment. In parallel, urinary 6beta-hydroxycortisol, a validated marker of CYP3A induction, was determined. UDCA did not affect biotransformation of budesonide and urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol either in patients or in healthy volunteers. Ratios of areas under plasma concentration-time curves (AUC(0-12 h) during UDCA/AUC(0-12 h) before UDCA) of both metabolites were not higher than those of budesonide itself. In contrast, administration of rifampicin markedly induced CYP3A metabolism, resulting in abolished budesonide plasma levels and high urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol. Metabolite formation was enhanced by rifampicin, but not by UDCA (e.g., AUC(16alpha-hydroxyprednisolone)/AUC(budesonide) in patients: baseline, 8.6 +/- 3.9; UDCA, 10.7 +/- 7.1; rifampicin, 527.0 +/- 248.7). In conclusion, UDCA is not a relevant inducer of CYP3A enzymes in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15726657     DOI: 10.1002/hep.20568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  5 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives for the treatment of cholestasis: lessons from basic science applied clinically.

Authors:  James L Boyer
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Medical treatment of cholestatic liver diseases: From pathobiology to pharmacological targets.

Authors:  Gustav Paumgartner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Concept on the pathogenesis and treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Vasiliy-Ivanovich Reshetnyak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Medical treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a role for novel bile acids and other (post-)transcriptional modulators?

Authors:  Ulrich Beuers; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick; Thomas Pusl; Erik R Rauws; Christian Rust
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 5.  Primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Simon Hohenester; Ronald P J Oude-Elferink; Ulrich Beuers
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.