Literature DB >> 15726546

Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Alice Lytwyn1, Irving E Salit, Janet Raboud, William Chapman, Teresa Darragh, Barbara Winkler, Jill Tinmouth, James B Mahony, Marie Sano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal carcinoma incidence is increasing, and is highest among men with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who have sex with men. Anal carcinoma and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) are ascertained on tissue histology, but requires invasive procedures. Screening for AIN using anal cytology was suggested. The authors evaluated agreement on cytologic and biopsy specimens from HIV-positive men undergoing anal carcinoma screening.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine HIV-positive men with a history of anal-receptive intercourse underwent anal cytology, anoscopy, and biopsy. Four pathologists independently assessed cytology and biopsy specimens and reached consensus for discordant cases.
RESULTS: Each pathologist evaluated 120 cytology and 155 biopsy specimens. The weighted kappa value for overall agreement was 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.59) for cytology specimens and 0.59 (95%CI, 0.55-0.63) for biopsy specimens. The median kappa values for pairwise agreement among pathologists and for agreement with consensus were, respectively, 0.69 and 0.77 for cytology and 0.66 and 0.75 for biopsy. At least 3 pathologists were in agreement for 92 (76.7%) cytology and 134 (86.5%) biopsy specimens. Reliability for the Bethesda classification system was at least moderate, except for the cytologic category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (kappa = 0.12). Fourteen of 29 (48.3%) cytology specimens and 36 of 47 (76.6%) biopsy specimens with consensus interpretation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were interpreted originally as HSIL by > or = 3 pathologists. The kappa value for agreement with consensus distinguishing HSIL from non-HSIL ranged from 0.55 to 0.88 for cytology specimens and from 0.76 to 0.94 for biopsy specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Agreement for cytologic and biopsy interpretations was generally at least moderate. Nevertheless, these results supported the need for disease indicators with greater reliability. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15726546     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

1.  Description of a pilot anal pap smear screening program among individuals attending a Veteran's Affairs HIV clinic.

Authors:  Isabella Rosa-Cunha; Vincent A Degennaro; Rene Hartmann; Clara Milikowski; Andres Irizarry; Brenda Heitman; Orlando Gómez-Marín; Gordon M Dickinson
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  Interrater agreement of anal cytology.

Authors:  Teresa M Darragh; Diane Tokugawa; Philip E Castle; Stephen Follansbee; Sylvia Borgonovo; Brandon J LaMere; Lauren Schwartz; Julia C Gage; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Management of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Carlos E Pineda; Mark L Welton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-05

Review 4.  Screening for Anal Cancer in Women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Teresa M Darragh; J Michael Berry-Lawhorn; Jennifer M Roberts; Michelle J Khan; Lori A Boardman; Elizabeth Chiao; Mark H Einstein; Stephen E Goldstone; Naomi Jay; Wendy M Likes; Elizabeth A Stier; Mark L Welton; Dorothy J Wiley; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Comparable performance of conventional and liquid-based cytology in diagnosing anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected and -uninfected Thai men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Nittaya Phanuphak; Nipat Teeratakulpisarn; Cherry Lim; Taweesak Changnam; Stephen Kerr; Amornrat Deesua; Piranun Hongchookiat; Piyanee Rodbamrung; Saranya Numto; Jiranuwat Barisri; Praphan Phanuphak; Somboon Keelawat; Annette H Sohn; Jintanat Ananworanich; Surang Triratanachat
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Anal dysplasia screening: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-06-01

7.  p16 is superior to ProEx C in identifying high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of the anal canal.

Authors:  Rajeev Bala; Benjamin A Pinsky; Andrew H Beck; Christina S Kong; Mark L Welton; Teri A Longacre
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 8.  Human papilloma virus: A review study of epidemiology, carcinogenesis, diagnostic methods, and treatment of all HPV-related cancers.

Authors:  Maryam Soheili; Hossein Keyvani; Marzieh Soheili; Sherko Nasseri
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-05-22

Review 9.  Relative accuracy of cervical and anal cytology for detection of high grade lesions by colposcope guided biopsy: a cut-point meta-analytic comparison.

Authors:  Edward R Cachay; Wollelaw Agmas; William C Mathews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing diagnostic tests: how to correct for the combined effects of interpretation and reference standard.

Authors:  Ahmet Omurtag; Andre A Fenton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.