Literature DB >> 15726532

Dose and schedule as determinants of outcomes in chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Daniel R Budman1.   

Abstract

Many cytotoxic agents for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer are available, but they have produced only modest results, even when the tumor burden is low. This relative lack of efficacy may be attributed, in part, to the nonspecificity of the current regimens. Additionally, there is evidence that the chemotherapy doses used in clinical practice are not optimal, which potentially compromises the outcomes when the thresholds of dose intensity are not reached. Variations in treatment underscore the need to return to the basics of chemotherapy administration: dose, schedule, concentration threshold, and therapeutic index. In patients with metastatic breast cancer a clear dose-response curve has been shown with some agents, including anthracyclines. The E-max model, which in its simplest form assumes a direct relation between the dose of a drug and its effect, may be used to improve dosing in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Consistent with this model, threshold effects have been observed in treatment with both anthracyclines and paclitaxel for breast cancer. There is also evidence that using dose-dense schedules may produce better outcomes with some regimens. Maintaining chemotherapy agents at full dose on schedule is crucial to treatment success, especially in adjuvant therapy. Consequently, treatment practices should use both dose intensity and dose compression to increase the likelihood of positive outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15726532     DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  4 in total

1.  HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Ignace de Hingh; Kurt Van Der Speeten; Martin Hubner; Marcello Deraco; Naoual Bakrin; Laurent Villeneuve; Shigeki Kusamura; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Patterns of Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer, according to the Residual Cancer Burden Index and Reductions in Neoadjuvant Treatment Intensity.

Authors:  Christoph Suppan; Florian Posch; Hannah Deborah Mueller; Nina Mischitz; Daniel Steiner; Eva Valentina Klocker; Lisa Setaffy; Ute Bargfrieder; Robert Hammer; Hubert Hauser; Philipp J Jost; Nadia Dandachi; Sigurd Lax; Marija Balic
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Phase I clinical trial of nintedanib plus paclitaxel in early HER-2-negative breast cancer (CNIO-BR-01-2010/GEICAM-2010-10 study).

Authors:  M Quintela-Fandino; A Urruticoechea; J Guerra; M Gil; A Gonzalez-Martin; R Marquez; E Hernandez-Agudo; C Rodriguez-Martin; M Gil-Martin; R Bratos; M J Escudero; S Vlassak; F Hilberg; R Colomer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Retrospective analysis of the use of G-CSF and its impact on dose response for anthracycline plus taxane-based schedules in early breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Pérez-Fidalgo; B Bermejo; I Chirivella; M T Martínez; I González; J M Cejalvo; I Catoira; P Martínez; E Contel; A Lluch
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.405

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.