Literature DB >> 15725281

Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds--a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure.

Louise Arup Fischer1, Torkil Menné, Jeanne Duus Johansen.   

Abstract

Nickel (Ni) is the most frequent cause of contact allergy among the female population. This makes it interesting to examine thresholds for elicitation under different conditions. Even though Ni exposure may be open, occluded, penetrating or oral, most dose-response studies in the literature concern single occluded application. The aims of this study were to assess thresholds of response by making a statistical analysis of available dose-response studies with single occluded exposure and comparing the results to thresholds from other modes of exposure. 8 occluded Ni dose-response studies were selected based on statistical considerations. The statistical analysis showed that 5% of a sensitized population react to 0.44 microg Ni/cm2 and 10% react to 1.04 microg Ni/cm2. In another study with a single open application, 7.8% of sensitized persons responded to a dose x6 higher than the dose to which 10% reacted in occluded exposure. When combining the exposure to Ni with an irritant, divagating results were found, although the literature shows evidence of an augmented response when combining exposure to an allergen and an irritant. The thresholds of penetrating exposure were found to be lower than the thresholds of single occluded exposure. Comparisons of different kind of exposures across studies are difficult, because of differences in the studies, although a comparison could be made by a study that compares the different exposures within the same individuals at the same time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725281     DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00523.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  5 in total

1.  Resin monomers act as adjuvants in Ni-induced allergic dermatitis in vivo.

Authors:  K Bando; H Takahashi; M Kinbara; Y Tanaka; T Kuroishi; K Sasaki; T Takano-Yamamoto; S Sugawara; Y Endo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Allergy and orthodontics.

Authors:  Sunitha Chakravarthi; Sridevi Padmanabhan; Arun B Chitharanjan
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2012-10

3.  Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?

Authors:  Rosemary L Nixon; Claire L Higgins; Danit Maor; Harini Rajgopal Bala; Alka Lalji; Katherine E Heim
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Nickel: Intrinsic Skin Sensitization Potency and Relation to Prevalence of Contact Allergy.

Authors:  David Basketter
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 4.867

5.  Ion Release and Surface Changes of Nickel-Titanium Archwires Induced by Changes in the pH Value of the Saliva-Significance for Human Health Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Zana Jusufi Osmani; Borut Poljšak; Saša Zelenika; Ervin Kamenar; Kristina Marković; Marko Perčić; Višnja Katić
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.