Literature DB >> 15725116

Are there downsides to mammography screening?

Cornelia J Baines1.   

Abstract

Most Americans clearly believe that routine screening mammography is beneficial. Given its widespread acceptance, it is useful to consider what the downsides of mammography screening are so that patients are fully informed in the decisions they make. This article lists some less well-recognized risks of mammography, such as false negatives and their accompanying false reassurance, as well as the direct and indirect costs to women and society. Three important downsides-radiation hazard, overdiagnosis of breast cancer, and the paradoxical increase in breast cancer mortality observed in screened women compared to controls age 40-49 years-are addressed. The article also considers the reasons that women are poorly informed about the downsides of mammography. There is, however, agreement that early diagnosis and treatment are important, and that new methods to reduce breast cancer deaths must be sought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725116     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.217162.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  5 in total

1.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Ingvar Andersson; Lars Janzon; Jonas Manjer; Jens Peter Garne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-03

2.  An abnormal screening mammogram causes more anxiety than a palpable lump in benign breast disease.

Authors:  C M G Keyzer-Dekker; L van Esch; J de Vries; M F Ernst; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; J A Roukema; A F W van der Steeg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Seeding of epithelial cells into circulation during surgery for breast cancer: the fate of malignant and benign mobilized cells.

Authors:  Oumar Camara; Andreas Kavallaris; Helmut Nöschel; Matthias Rengsberger; Cornelia Jörke; Katharina Pachmann
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Framing overdiagnosis in breast screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts.

Authors:  Lisa M Parker; Lucie Rychetnik; Stacy Carter
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Women's responses to changes in U.S. Preventive Task Force's mammography screening guidelines: results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Shirley Morrison Bluethmann; Margaret Sheets; Kelly Morrison Opdyke; Kathryn Gates-Ferris; Marc Hurlbert; Elizabeth Harden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.