Literature DB >> 1572493

Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial.

P Lundorff1, J Thorburn, B Lindblom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the fertility outcome after laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy.
DESIGN: A randomized trial versus laparotomy was performed between May 1987 and June 1989.
SETTING: The study was conducted in a clinical university center, the Sahlgrens Hospital. PATIENTS: A group of 105 patients with tubal pregnancy were stratified with regard to risk determinants and age and randomized to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Eighty-seven patients who desired pregnancy were evaluated for subsequent fertility outcome.
INTERVENTIONS: Linear salpingotomy was performed in both surgical groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We evaluated the fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingotomy for comparison with the outcome after laparotomy.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in the overall fertility outcome. A substantially higher proportion of patients in the laparotomy group were subjected to adhesiolysis performed at a second-look laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The fertility prospects are not impaired by laparoscopic surgery. Adhesiolysis at a second-look laparoscopy, especially after laparotomy, might be beneficial in selected cases and may serve to improve subsequent fertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1572493     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55015-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

Review 1.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-11-16

Review 4.  Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  P J Hajenius; F Mol; B W J Mol; P M M Bossuyt; W M Ankum; F van der Veen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 5.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-04-20

6.  Laparoscopic Hemostasis of Intractable Delayed Postpartum Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Dipak Limbachiya; Mangirish Kenkre; Siddharth Shah; Rashmi Kumari; Hardik D Desai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 7.  Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  S Sauerland; F Agresta; R Bergamaschi; G Borzellino; A Budzynski; G Champault; A Fingerhut; A Isla; M Johansson; P Lundorff; B Navez; S Saad; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Emergency laparoscopy--current best practice.

Authors:  Oliver Warren; James Kinross; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolin Cheng; Xiaoyu Tian; Zhen Yan; Mengmeng Jia; Jie Deng; Ying Wang; Dongmei Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.