OBJECTIVE: To determine if air conditioning might mitigate summer reductions in semen quality. DESIGN: Prospective study of semen quality in summer and winter. SETTING: Normal human volunteers were studied in the setting of a fertility laboratory. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of volunteers were selected from the vicinity of New Orleans: 64 men who worked indoors during the summer in air-conditioned environments and 76 others who worked outdoors. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameters of manual semen analysis were examined for seasonal and group differences. RESULTS: Remarkably similar reductions in semen quality during summer as compared with winter were observed in both indoor and outdoor workers, respectively, with regard to the following parameters of semen quality: 19% and 19% in sperm concentration, 25% and 27% in total sperm per ejaculate, 17% and 20% in motile sperm concentration, 13% and 15% in percent sperm with normal morphology, and 23% and 23% in concentration of morphologically normal motile sperm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the hypothesis that the heat of the summer is detrimental to male reproductive capacity. The available evidence suggests instead a possible role of photoperiod in causing the seasonal changes in semen quality.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if air conditioning might mitigate summer reductions in semen quality. DESIGN: Prospective study of semen quality in summer and winter. SETTING: Normal human volunteers were studied in the setting of a fertility laboratory. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of volunteers were selected from the vicinity of New Orleans: 64 men who worked indoors during the summer in air-conditioned environments and 76 others who worked outdoors. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameters of manual semen analysis were examined for seasonal and group differences. RESULTS: Remarkably similar reductions in semen quality during summer as compared with winter were observed in both indoor and outdoor workers, respectively, with regard to the following parameters of semen quality: 19% and 19% in sperm concentration, 25% and 27% in total sperm per ejaculate, 17% and 20% in motile sperm concentration, 13% and 15% in percent sperm with normal morphology, and 23% and 23% in concentration of morphologically normal motile sperm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the hypothesis that the heat of the summer is detrimental to male reproductive capacity. The available evidence suggests instead a possible role of photoperiod in causing the seasonal changes in semen quality.
Authors: Craig Hansen; Thomas J Luben; Jason D Sacks; Andrew Olshan; Susan Jeffay; Lillian Strader; Sally D Perreault Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 9.031