Literature DB >> 15724748

Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition.

Anut Itthagarun1, Franklin R Tay, David H Pashley, James S Wefel, Franklin García-Godoy, Stephen H Y Wei.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that formation of inhibition zones by bonded restorations in artificially-induced carious dentin lesions is related to the permeability of the self-etch adhesives.
METHODS: Fluid conductance of four single-step self-etch adhesives (Prompt L-Pop, Etch&Prime 3.0, One-Up Bond F and Reactmer Bond), and a control two-step self-etch adhesive (UniFil Bond) were measured after sound dentin surfaces were:(1) acid-etched; (2) polished to produce smear layers; (3) bonded with the adhesive; each at 20 cm hydrostatic pressure (hp). Osmotic fluid conductance was also determined for the bonded dentin after immersion in 4.8 M CaCl2 at 0 cm hp. For artificial caries inhibition, a non-fluoride releasing (NFR) two-step self-etch adhesive (UniFil Bond) and a fluoride-releasing (FR) single-step adhesive (Reactmer Bond) were used in combination with a NFR composite (Metafil CX) or a FR restorative material (Reactmer Paste). Artificial caries were induced in these restorations, from which 120 +/- 10 microm thick sections and the effect of caries inhibition were quantitatively assessed with polarizing light microscopy and image analysis.
RESULTS: Fluid conductance after bonding with the single-step adhesives Prompt L-Pop and Etch&Prime 3.0 were not significantly different from those recorded from smear layer-covered dentin. Although better seals were achieved with One-Up Bond F and Reactmer Bond, fluid conductance at 20 cm hp was significantly higher than the two-step self-etch adhesive UniFil Bond. Osmotic conductance at 0 cm hp were not significantly different from normal fluid conductance at 20 cm hp. The sizes of artificial carious lesions in UniFil Bond were significantly higher irrespective of whether a FR or NFR composite was used. Significant reduction in lesion size occurred in Reactmer Bond with the use of a NFR composite, and even more so with the use of a FR composite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15724748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  6 in total

1.  Effects of ethanol addition on the water sorption/solubility and percent conversion of comonomers in model dental adhesives.

Authors:  Juliana Malacarne-Zanon; David H Pashley; Kelli A Agee; Stephen Foulger; Marcelo Corrêa Alves; Lorenzo Breschi; Milena Cadenaro; Fernanda P Garcia; Marcela R Carrilho
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Effect of application mode on interfacial morphology and chemistry between dentine and self-etch adhesives.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Yong Wang
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Membrane permeability properties of dental adhesive films.

Authors:  Marcela R Carrilho; Franklin R Tay; Adam M Donnelly; Kelli A Agee; Ricardo M Carvalho; Keiichi Hosaka; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro D Loguercio; David H Pashley
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 4.  Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: A review.

Authors:  Manar M Abu Nawareg; Ahmed Z Zidan; Jianfeng Zhou; Ayaka Chiba; Jungi Tagami; David H Pashley
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Co-Blend Application Mode of Bulk Fill Composite Resin.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Nabulsi; Alaa Daud; Cynthia Yiu; Hanan Omar; Salvatore Sauro; Amr Fawzy; Umer Daood
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Effect of a Desensitizing Varnish on Microleakage of Two Self-Etch Adhesives.

Authors:  Anna Saffarpour; Aida Saffarpour; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard; Niloofar Golmohamadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.