Literature DB >> 15724537

Treatment simulation approaches for the estimation of the distributions of treatment quality parameters generated by geometrical uncertainties.

C Baum1, M Alber, M Birkner, F Nüsslin.   

Abstract

Geometric uncertainties arise during treatment planning and treatment and mean that dose-dependent parameters such as EUD are random variables with a patient specific probability distribution. Treatment planning with highly conformal treatment techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy requires new evaluation tools which allow us to estimate this influence of geometrical uncertainties on the probable treatment dose for a planned dose distribution. Monte Carlo simulations of treatment courses with recalculation of the dose according to the daily geometric errors are a gold standard for such an evaluation. Distribution histograms which show the relative frequency of a treatment quality parameter in the treatment simulations can be used to evaluate the potential risks and chances of a planned dose distribution. As treatment simulations with dose recalculation are very time consuming for sufficient statistical accuracy, it is proposed to do treatment simulations in the dose parameter space where the result is mainly determined by the systematic and random component of the geometrical uncertainties. Comparison of the parameter space simulation method with the gold standard for prostate cases and a head and neck case shows good agreement as long as the number of fractions is high enough and the influence of tissue inhomogeneities and surface curvature on the dose is small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15724537     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/24/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Consideration of the likely benefit from implementation of prostate image-guided radiotherapy using current margin sizes: a radiobiological analysis.

Authors:  G S J Tudor; Y L Rimmer; T B Nguyen; M A Cowen; S J Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Surface-constrained nonrigid registration for dose monitoring in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Guillaume Cazoulat; Antoine Simon; Aurelien Dumenil; Khemara Gnep; Renaud de Crevoisier; Oscar Acosta; Pascal Haigron
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.

Authors:  Joseph A Moore; J James Gordon; Mitchell Anscher; Joaquin Silva; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.

Authors:  Joseph A Moore; John J Gordon; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Intensity modulated and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plans for oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of their sensitivity to set-up errors and uncertainties.

Authors:  N Ploquin; H Lau; P Dunscombe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.