Literature DB >> 15723817

The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events.

Andrew Chang1, Paul M Schyve, Richard J Croteau, Dennis S O'Leary, Jerod M Loeb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current US national discussions on patient safety are not based on a common language. This hinders systematic application of data obtained from incident reports, and learning from near misses and adverse events.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a common terminology and classification schema (taxonomy) for collecting and organizing patient safety data.
METHODS: The project comprised a systematic literature review; evaluation of existing patient safety terminologies and classifications, and identification of those that should be included in the core set of a standardized taxonomy; assessment of the taxonomy's face and content validity; the gathering of input from patient safety stakeholders in multiple disciplines; and a preliminary study of the taxonomy's comparative reliability.
RESULTS: Elements (terms) and structures (data fields) from existing classification schemes and reporting systems could be grouped into five complementary root nodes or primary classifications: impact, type, domain, cause, and prevention and mitigation. The root nodes were then divided into 21 subclassifications which in turn are subdivided into more than 200 coded categories and an indefinite number of uncoded text fields to capture narrative information. An earlier version of the taxonomy (n = 111 coded categories) demonstrated acceptable comparability with the categorized data requirements of the ICU safety reporting system.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) Patient Safety Event Taxonomy could facilitate a common approach for patient safety information systems. Having access to standardized data would make it easier to file patient safety event reports and to conduct root cause analyses in a consistent fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723817     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  55 in total

1.  [Occurrence and prevention of errors in intensive care units].

Authors:  A Valentin
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Medication errors in psychiatric treatment: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Geetha Jayaram
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-12

3.  Interpreting adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports as hospital patient safety incidents.

Authors:  Emma C Davies; Christopher F Green; David R Mottram; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Application of traditional indexes and adverse events in the ophthalmologic perioperative medical quality evaluation during 2010-2012.

Authors:  Yong-Na Bian; Jian Shi; Jun-Jun She; Jie Wu; Jian-Min Gao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Voluntary incident reporting tool for a multi-facility environment.

Authors:  Victor Pham; Christine Huang; Laura Noirot; Richard M Reichley; Erik J Rasmussen; Wm Claiborne Dunagan; Victoria J Fraser; Barbara Caleca; Thomas C Bailey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 6.  Translational cognition for decision support in critical care environments: a review.

Authors:  Vimla L Patel; Jiajie Zhang; Nicole A Yoskowitz; Robert Green; Osman R Sayan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Status and problems of adverse event reporting systems in korean hospitals.

Authors:  Jeongeun Kim; Sukwha Kim; Yoenyi Jung; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2010-09-30

8.  Toward standardized, comparable public health systems data: a taxonomic description of essential public health work.

Authors:  Jacqueline Merrill; Jonathan Keeling; Kristine Gebbie
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) study.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Maurizia Capuzzo; Bertrand Guidet; Rui P Moreno; Lorenz Dolanski; Peter Bauer; Philipp G H Metnitz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Catherine Arnott Smith
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 6.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.