Literature DB >> 15723768

The use of sentinel injury deaths to evaluate the quality of multiple source reporting for occupational injuries.

Gordon S Smith1, Mark A Veazie, Katy L Benjamin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought to develop an efficient method for evaluating the validity and completeness of routinely available sources of occupational injury fatality data.
METHODS: Deaths due to falls from elevations, machinery, and electrocutions were selected as sentinel injuries likely to have occurred at work. Deaths from these injuries were identified from Maryland vital statistics over 7 years. The work-relatedness of these injuries and sensitivity of reporting were determined from death certificates, medical examiner reports, the National Traumatic Occupational Fatality System (NTOF), the Maryland Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MOSH), and Workers' Compensation (WC) data.
RESULTS: A total of 527 deaths were identified for ages 16 and above, of which, 45% were work-related. Identification of work-related deaths varied by source: medical examiner (100%), death certificates (89%), NTOF (68%), MOSH (59%), and WC (44%). Reporting differed by age, cause of injury, year, occupation, and industry.
CONCLUSIONS: Examination of work-relatedness for deaths from certain causes is an efficient means of evaluating the quality of occupational injury reporting source data. These sentinel injuries uncovered significant underreporting in sources used by national surveillance systems, resulted in improved NTOF reporting, and suggest the need to make more use of medical examiner data when available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723768     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.07.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  5 in total

1.  Industrial Injury Hospitalizations Billed to Payers Other Than Workers' Compensation: Characteristics and Trends by State.

Authors:  Jeanne M Sears; Stephen M Bowman; Laura Blanar; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Blurring the distinctions between on and off the job injuries: similarities and differences in circumstances.

Authors:  G S Smith; G S Sorock; H M Wellman; T K Courtney; G S Pransky
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Characteristics of work-related fatal and hospitalised injuries not captured in workers' compensation data.

Authors:  M Koehoorn; L Tamburic; F Xu; H Alamgir; P A Demers; C B McLeod
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Quality of the record of data on fatal workplace injuries in Brazil.

Authors:  Adriana Galdino; Vilma Sousa Santana; Silvia Ferrite
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  Quality and integration of public health information systems: A systematic review focused on immunization and vital records systems.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Hilary M Kirk; L Michele Issel
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2012-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.