Literature DB >> 15723426

Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.

Anastasia Ivanova1, Robert C Barrier, Vance W Berger.   

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a model-based approach to detect and adjust for observable selection bias in a randomized clinical trial with two treatments and binary outcomes. The proposed method was evaluated using simulations of a randomized block design in which the investigator favoured the experimental treatment by attempting to enroll stronger patients (with greater probability of treatment success) if the probability of the next treatment being experimental was high, and enroll weak patients (with less probability of treatment success) if the probability of the next treatment being experimental was low. The method allows not only testing for the presence of observable selection bias, but also testing for a difference in treatment effects, adjusting for possible selection bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723426     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of selection bias on test decisions in trials with a time-to-event outcome.

Authors:  Marcia Viviane Rückbeil; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Nicole Heussen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Accuracy of the Berger-Exner test for detecting third-order selection bias in randomised controlled trials: a simulation-based investigation.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Bo Fu; Sheila Gudehithlu; Vance W Berger
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  Methodological Aspects in Studies Based on Clinical Routine Data.

Authors:  Lieven Nils Kennes
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.845

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.