Literature DB >> 1572342

Specificity of arsenite in potentiating cytogenetic damage induced by the DNA crosslinking agent diepoxybutane.

J K Wiencke1, J W Yager.   

Abstract

In the present study, the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and chromosomal aberrations were measured in normal human lymphocytes treated with low concentrations of arsenite alone (0.5-2.0 microM) and arsenite in combination with the potent DNA crosslinking agent diepoxybutane (DEB). Experiments were carried out with lymphocytes from blood donors with different sensitivities to SCE induction by DEB. Arsenite, beginning at concentrations as low as 1 microM, increased SCE frequencies; chromosomal aberration frequencies were increased at 2 microM of arsenite. DEB treatments alone increased SCE frequencies and chromosomal aberrations. The yields of chromatid deletions and exchanges in lymphocytes exposed to both arsenite and DEB were markedly increased above the levels expected if the effects of the two agents had been simply additive. The frequencies of chromatid deletions were 4- to 8-fold greater than expected and chromatid exchanges were increased 7- to 40-fold. Chromatid exchanges detected in cells treated with arsenite and DEB were predominately incomplete exchanges. The most dramatic increases in chromatid aberrations were observed in lymphocytes from an individual sensitive to SCE induction by DEB, indicating that individuals may vary in their sensitivity to the co-clastogenic effects of arsenite. At concentrations that dramatically affect aberrations, arsenite had no effect on the induction of SCEs by DEB. These studies suggest a specific interaction of arsenite with the induction or repair of DNA damage produced by DEB that leads to chromosomal aberrations but not to SCEs. Based on the selective chemical reactivity of low concentrations of arsenite with proteins containing vicinal dithiols and the occurrence of these groups within DNA repair proteins, it is proposed that the specific co-clastogenic effects of arsenite may be mediated by its interference with DNA repair activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1572342     DOI: 10.1002/em.2850190303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  9 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Mechanisms of Arsenic-Induced Disruption of DNA Repair.

Authors:  Lok Ming Tam; Nathan E Price; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Variability in sensitivity to arsenite does not correlate with arsenic accumulation rate in normal human lymphoblasts.

Authors:  Ping Li; Ahmed N Uddin; Zijuan Liu; Rita Mukhopadhyay; Elena V Komissarova; Barry P Rosen; Toby G Rossman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium.

Authors:  Konstantin Salnikow; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Gene expression levels in normal human lymphoblasts with variable sensitivities to arsenite: identification of GGT1 and NFKBIE expression levels as possible biomarkers of susceptibility.

Authors:  Elena V Komissarova; Ping Li; Ahmed N Uddin; Xuyan Chen; Arthur Nadas; Toby G Rossman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Genotoxic monitoring of workers at a hazardous waste disposal site in Mexico.

Authors:  M E Gonsebatt; A M Salazar; R Montero; F Díaz Barriga; L Yáñez; H Gómez; P Ostrosky-Wegman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Molecular features in arsenic-induced lung tumors.

Authors:  Roland Hubaux; Daiana D Becker-Santos; Katey Ss Enfield; David Rowbotham; Stephen Lam; Wan L Lam; Victor D Martinez
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Characterization of gene expression changes associated with MNNG, arsenic, or metal mixture treatment in human keratinocytes: application of cDNA microarray technology.

Authors:  Dong-Soon Bae; William H Hanneman; Raymond S H Yang; Julie A Campain
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Enhancement of chromosomal damage by arsenic: implications for mechanism.

Authors:  J W Yager; J K Wiencke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Substantial Evidences Indicate That Inorganic Arsenic Is a Genotoxic Carcinogen: a Review.

Authors:  Jinia Sinha Roy; Debmita Chatterjee; Nandana Das; Ashok K Giri
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2018-10-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.