Literature DB >> 15723378

Multislice MR first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: impact of the receiver coil array.

Martin H K Hoffmann1, Florian T Schmid, Martin Jeltsch, Arthur Wunderlich, Jeffrey L Duerk, Bernd Schmitz, Andrik J Aschoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare a new 12-element body phased-array coil with a conventional four-element surface receiver coil array to provide increased signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for cardiac steady state free precession (SSFP) perfusion imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients were included in the study. Patients were examined both with a four-element surface coil array and a 12-element body coil array. First-pass myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation recovery SSFP was acquired during antecubital injection of Gd-DTPA. Imaging parameters: TR 2.8 msec/TE 1.3 msec, flip angle 50 degrees , bandwidth 960 Hz/pixel and half-Fourier acquisition. SNR was calculated using six regions of interest (ROI) for the myocardial perfusion scans. Calculations of corresponding ROIs using the two different coil setups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Semiquantitative perfusion parameters were calculated for both groups.
RESULTS: The mean SNR in myocardial perfusion imaging increased by 21% using the 12-element coil setup (P < 0.001) when compared to the four-element coil. ROI comparisons revealed an increased signal inhomogeneity with the 12-element coil when compared to four-element coil experiments. Absolute normal range values of semiquantitative perfusion parameters were consistently higher using the 12-element coil setup (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The 12-element coil array provides higher SNR, but these improvements come with trade-offs in image homogeneity. Increased SNR translates into higher semiquantitative perfusion values and offers the potential for improved detection of perfusion defects. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723378     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance cardiac perfusion imaging-a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Thomas Schlosser; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: a new era in the detection of reversible myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  S Watkins; K G Oldroyd; S Frohwein
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Impact of baseline calibration on semiquantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion reserve by adenosine stress MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Seitz; Giancarlo Pirozzolo; Udo Sechtem; Raffi Bekeredjian; Peter Ong; Heiko Mahrholdt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow: the impact of surface coil-related field inhomogeneity and a comparison of methods for its correction.

Authors:  Christopher A Miller; Li-Yueh Hsu; Allison Ta; Hannah Conn; Susanne Winkler; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  FLASH proton density imaging for improved surface coil intensity correction in quantitative and semi-quantitative SSFP perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Peter Kellman; Li-Yueh Hsu; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.