Literature DB >> 15723338

Interpretation of submicroscopic deletions of the BCR or ABL gene should not depend on extra signal-FISH: problems in interpretation of submicroscopic deletion of the BCR or ABL gene with extra signal-FISH.

Young Ree Kim1, Han Ik Cho, Sung Soo Yoon, Seonyang Park, Byoung Kook Kim, Young Kyung Lee, Honggu Chun, Hee Chan Kim, Dong Soon Lee.   

Abstract

Several groups have demonstrated that a submicroscopic gene deletion in Ph+ chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is associated with a poor prognosis and reduced response to treatment. To assess the variation between detection methods in the interpretation of a submicroscopic gene deletion, we performed an extra signal (ES)-FISH BCR/ABL and double-FISH (D-FISH) BCR/ABL on frozen bone marrow cells from 79 patients with CML (63 in the chronic phase, 6 in the accelerated phase, and 10 in blast crisis) and 30 patients with a BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorder as determined by RT-PCR. The normal cutoff values were 0.22% for ES-FISH and 0.25% for D-FISH. The cutoff values for false-positive signals from a juxtaposition of the BCR and ABL gene were 11% in ES-FISH and 13% in D-FISH. Of the 14 patients who showed an ABL gene deletion by ES-FISH, 5 had an ABL deletion only, 5 had both a BCR and an ABL deletion, but 4 proved to have a classic BCR/ABL rearrangement without a submicroscopic deletion, as determined by D-FISH. Discrepant results between ES- and D-FISH were observed in 12 of the 79 patients (15.8%), and the main causes of a discrepancy were a false-positive ABL deletion (4 of 12, 33%), a variant Philadelphia chromosome (3 of 12, 25%), an inversion of derivative chromosome 9 at the very breakpoint of the ABL gene (9q32) (1 of 12, 8.3%), a cryptic variant Ph chromosome (1 of 12, 8.3%), and a marker chromosome (1 of 12, 8.3%). Although there was no significant difference in the sensitivity for the detection of the fusion signal between ES- and D-FISH, ES-FISH showed a high percentage of cells with false-positive fusion signals (1 orange, 1 green, 1 yellow), which makes it difficult to interpret the submicroscopic ABL deletion. In conclusion, an interpretation of the submicroscopic deletions of the BCR or ABL gene should not depend on ES-FISH. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723338     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  2 in total

1.  Molecular cytogenetic study of derivative chromosome 9 deletion in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Ayda Bennour; Ines Ouahchi; Yosra Ben Youssef; Monia Zaier; Mohamed Adnéne Laatiri; Imed Harrabi; Balkis Meddeb; Moez Elloumi; Abderrahim Khelif; Ali Saad; Halima Sennana
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Application of tri-colour, dual fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) system for the characterization of BCR-ABL1 fusion in chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) and residual disease monitoring.

Authors:  Lisa Lp Siu; Edmond Sk Ma; Wai Shan Wong; Man Hong Chan; Kit Fai Wong
Journal:  BMC Blood Disord       Date:  2009-07-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.