PURPOSE: To examine the variability of results obtained from computer analysis of left ventricular gated blood pool (LVGBP) images by nuclear medicine centres in the UK. METHODS: Twelve data sets of LVGBP images were distributed via commercial software suppliers to nuclear medicine centres in the UK. Two of the data sets were duplicates and three were acquired from the same patient with different total counts in the images. The quality of the images was also variable and two images had poorly defined left ventricular walls. A questionnaire was used to identify the parameters used during the analysis and to give an indication of the number of LVGBP scans per year routinely carried out by each centre as well as report the results obtained from the analysis. RESULTS: Results were received from 63 nuclear medicine centres using 77 computer systems. The vast majority of participants (57) carried out fewer than 10 scans per month. Only two centres performed more than 30 scans per month. Sixteen centres did not quote a minimum normal value for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 36 did not record a maximum value. The remainder recorded between 0.40 and 0.60 for the minimum of normal range and 0.60-0.90 for the maximum of normal range. Analysis of returns showed that LVEF estimates for the data sets were highly variable between centres and computer systems. The overall standard deviation of results compared to the mean for each study was 0.076. Approximately half this variation was due to systematic variation between centres. The overall precision taking into consideration this systematic variation, was 0.055. Lower variability was found between studies with higher overall counts and this was highly significant.
PURPOSE: To examine the variability of results obtained from computer analysis of left ventricular gated blood pool (LVGBP) images by nuclear medicine centres in the UK. METHODS: Twelve data sets of LVGBP images were distributed via commercial software suppliers to nuclear medicine centres in the UK. Two of the data sets were duplicates and three were acquired from the same patient with different total counts in the images. The quality of the images was also variable and two images had poorly defined left ventricular walls. A questionnaire was used to identify the parameters used during the analysis and to give an indication of the number of LVGBP scans per year routinely carried out by each centre as well as report the results obtained from the analysis. RESULTS: Results were received from 63 nuclear medicine centres using 77 computer systems. The vast majority of participants (57) carried out fewer than 10 scans per month. Only two centres performed more than 30 scans per month. Sixteen centres did not quote a minimum normal value for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 36 did not record a maximum value. The remainder recorded between 0.40 and 0.60 for the minimum of normal range and 0.60-0.90 for the maximum of normal range. Analysis of returns showed that LVEF estimates for the data sets were highly variable between centres and computer systems. The overall standard deviation of results compared to the mean for each study was 0.076. Approximately half this variation was due to systematic variation between centres. The overall precision taking into consideration this systematic variation, was 0.055. Lower variability was found between studies with higher overall counts and this was highly significant.
Authors: Hans Huang; Prabhjot S Nijjar; Jeffrey R Misialek; Anne Blaes; Nicholas P Derrico; Felipe Kazmirczak; Igor Klem; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Chetan Shenoy Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Nathalie I Bouwer; Agnes Jager; Crista Liesting; Marcel J M Kofflard; Jasper J Brugts; Jos J E M Kitzen; Eric Boersma; Mark-David Levin Journal: Breast Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Nathalie I Bouwer; Tessa G Steenbruggen; Hánah N Rier; Jos J E M Kitzen; Carolien H Smorenburg; Marlies L van Bekkum; Paul C de Jong; Jan C Drooger; Cynthia Holterhues; Marcel J M Kofflard; Eric Boersma; Gabe S Sonke; Mark-David Levin; Agnes Jager Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 7.316
Authors: Nathalie I Bouwer; Crista Liesting; Marcel J M Kofflard; Sylvia M Sprangers-van Campen; Jasper J Brugts; Jos J E M Kitzen; Michael A Fouraux; Mark-David Levin; Eric Boersma Journal: Cardiooncology Date: 2019-05-28