Literature DB >> 15722071

The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions.

Caroline Moreau1, Jean Bouyer, Hélène Goulard, Nathalie Bajos.   

Abstract

Although access to and knowledge of emergency contraception (EC) have improved, numerous unplanned pregnancies occur each year. We thus assessed the remaining barriers to EC use in a population of women seeking an abortion in four abortion centers in France in 2002. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 1365 women. Most women have heard of EC (89%), but access to information remained limited in socially disadvantaged populations. Nevertheless, the unperceived risk of pregnancy appeared to be the most limiting factor to EC use. Only 38.5% of women were aware of pregnancy risk at the time of the intercourse that made them pregnant. Of these women, 48% minimized the risk later, resulting in the decision not to use EC. As the perception of risk is commonly reevaluated by women over time, which probably affects EC use, it could be important to promote advance supply of EC so that women could use it immediately after a recognized unprotected intercourse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15722071     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  9 in total

1.  Emergency contraception: dispelling the myths and misperceptions.

Authors:  Elizabeth Westley; Anna Glasier
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Access to emergency hormonal contraception from community pharmacies and family planning clinics.

Authors:  Gaye Lewington; Kay Marshall
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Women and postfertilization effects of birth control: consistency of beliefs, intentions and reported use.

Authors:  Huong M Dye; Joseph B Stanford; Stephen C Alder; Han S Kim; Patricia A Murphy
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Use of non-emergency contraceptive pills and concoctions as emergency contraception among Nigerian University students: results of a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anthony Idowu Ajayi; Ezebunwa Ethelbert Nwokocha; Wilson Akpan; Oladele Vincent Adeniyi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  CUBES: A practical toolkit to measure enablers and barriers to behavior for effective intervention design.

Authors:  Elisabeth Engl; Sema K Sgaier
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2019-03-18

7.  Contraceptive Behaviors in Polish Women Aged 18-35-a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Magdalena Zgliczynska; Iwona Szymusik; Aleksandra Sierocinska; Armand Bajaka; Martyna Rowniak; Nicole Sochacki-Wojcicka; Miroslaw Wielgos; Katarzyna Kosinska-Kaczynska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Knowledge of, beliefs about, and perceived barriers to the use of the emergency contraception pill among women aged 18-51 in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Anne Marie Whelan; Donald B Langille; Samantha J K White; Mark Asbridge; Gordon Flowerdew
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2011-09-14

9.  Australian women's fertility experiences prior to a termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  Wendy Abigail; Sheryl de Lacey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.