Literature DB >> 15721728

Comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.

Syozo Hidaka1, Masashi Kawamoto, Shigeaki Kurita, Osafumi Yuge.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of propofol and midazolam on cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) activity during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study.
SETTING: Operating room of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for knee surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive sedation with either propofol or midazolam. MEASUREMENTS: Heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), and SAP variability (SAPV) were used for the analysis. These values were measured at the preanesthetic period, after intrathecal injection for spinal anesthesia, after sedation with propofol or midazolam, and just before the end of surgery with sedation. Cross-spectral analyses of the HR and SAP data were assessed to quantify the frequency-related coherence spectra and phase spectra. MAIN
RESULTS: Spinal anesthesia itself had no effect on power spectral changes in both groups. After sedation, as for HRV, high-frequency (HF) power (HF, 0.15-0.40 Hz) did not change, whereas low-frequency (LF) power (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz) and LF/HF, an indicator of CANS balance, significantly decreased with propofol. Further, coherence in cross-spectra presented depression in the LF band area after sedation with propofol. Before the end of surgery with sedation, LF and LF/HF in both HRV and SAPV were correlated with age in those with propofol; however, scarce relation was observed in those who received midazolam.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol was more potent than midazolam in causing CANS activity to be sympatholytic during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia and which was correlated with age only with propofol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721728     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  8 in total

1.  A novel online method to monitor autonomic nervous activity based on arterial wall impedance and heart rate variability.

Authors:  Abdugheni Kutluk; Toshio Tsuji; Teiji Ukawa; Ryuji Nakamura; Noboru Saeki; Masao Yoshizumi; Masashi Kawamoto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Propofol and arrhythmias: two sides of the coin.

Authors:  Qiang Liu; Ai-ling Kong; Rong Chen; Cheng Qian; Shao-wen Liu; Bao-gui Sun; Le-xin Wang; Long-sheng Song; Jiang Hong
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation During Regional Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Priyanka Khurana; Ankit Agarwal; Rk Verma; Pk Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-12

4.  A comparison of equisedative infusions of propofol and midazolam for conscious sedation during spinal anesthesia - a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Abhiruchi Patki; V C Shelgaonkar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01

5.  Parecoxib Possesses Anxiolytic Properties in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Study.

Authors:  Despoina G Sarridou; Georgia Chalmouki; Maria Braoudaki; Ioanna Siafaka; Chrisi Asmatzi; Athina Vadalouka
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2016-02-09

6.  Comparison of Causal and Non-causal Strategies for the Assessment of Baroreflex Sensitivity in Predicting Acute Kidney Dysfunction After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Vlasta Bari; Emanuele Vaini; Valeria Pistuddi; Angela Fantinato; Beatrice Cairo; Beatrice De Maria; Laura Adelaide Dalla Vecchia; Marco Ranucci; Alberto Porta
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol.

Authors:  Maayan Zucker; Gregory Kagan; Nimrod Adi; Ilai Ronel; Idit Matot; Lilach Zac; Or Goren
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.376

8.  Effects of Propofol Treatment in Neural Progenitors Derived from Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Bo Long; Shenglan Li; Haipeng Xue; Li Sun; Dong H Kim; Ying Liu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.