Literature DB >> 15721564

Frequency-specific cochlear damage in guinea pig after exposure to different types of realistic industrial noise.

Edeltraut Emmerich1, Frank Richter, Volker Linss, Werner Linss.   

Abstract

For the causal evaluation of occupational hearing damage it is important to identify definitely the noise source. Here we tested, whether recordings of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in awake guinea pigs can distinguish the effects of different industrial noises. Six groups of 12 animals each were investigated before and over four months after a single 2 h exposure to specific, played-back industrial noise as well as before and for 2 months after impulse noise exposure. We compared broadband noise (buzz saw, bottle washing machine), low frequency noise (drawing press), and mid-frequency noise (bottle filling machine). All animals had stable DPOAE levels before noise exposure. Frequency specific decreases in DPOAEs were found after exposure to the different noises. Broadband noise diminished mostly all frequencies tested, whereas low- or mid-frequency noise had a greater effect on DPOAE evoked by middle and higher frequencies, respectively. DPOAE evoked by middle and higher frequencies were obliterated after impulse noise. Morphological analysis of the cochleae confirmed these alterations. OHC loss was found in the middle turns of the cochleae corresponding to the diminution of DPOAE. We conclude that different kinds of industrial noise tend to produce typical changes in DPOAE levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721564     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  5 in total

1.  The cochleogram of the guinea pig.

Authors:  Volker Linss; Werner Linss; Edeltraut Emmerich; Frank Richter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hidden hearing loss is associated with loss of ribbon synapses of cochlea inner hair cells.

Authors:  Feng Song; Bin Gan; Na Wang; Zhe Wang; An-Ting Xu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Abnormal Auditory Gain in Hyperacusis: Investigation with a Computational Model.

Authors:  Peter U Diehl; Roland Schaette
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Induction of enhanced acoustic startle response by noise exposure: dependence on exposure conditions and testing parameters and possible relevance to hyperacusis.

Authors:  Rony H Salloum; Christopher Yurosko; Lia Santiago; Sharon A Sandridge; James A Kaltenbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.

Authors:  Adam Sheppard; Massimo Ralli; Antonio Gilardi; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.