| Literature DB >> 15721493 |
Barend L van der Hoeven1, Nuno M M Pires, Hazem M Warda, Pranobe V Oemrawsingh, Bart J M van Vlijmen, Paul H A Quax, Martin J Schalij, Ernst E van der Wall, J Wouter Jukema.
Abstract
In-stent restenosis is the major drawback of percutaneous coronary interventions, occurring in 10-40% of the patients. Recently, new stents have emerged which are loaded with anti-inflammatory, anti-migratory, anti-proliferative or pro-healing drugs. These drugs are supposed to inhibit inflammation and neointimal growth and subsequently in-stent restenosis. In this review article the results of human clinical studies investigating drug-eluting stents are discussed from a clinical point of view, focussing on the efficacy in the prevention of restenosis and their potential side effects. Both success and failure in the field of drug-eluting stents have been described. Successful devices are the sirolimus-eluting and the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents. Potentially dangerous side effects of drug-eluting stents are adverse drug interactions, incomplete stent apposition and increased in-stent thrombosis rates. Demonstration of long-term efficacy is mandatory since in some animal studies a delayed healing has been observed. Currently, the successful drug-eluting stents are under investigation in all types of lesions. We conclude that the results with some drug-eluting stents are promising, but further evidence on long-term efficacy and safety, also in high-risk subgroups, is needed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15721493 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.01.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol ISSN: 0167-5273 Impact factor: 4.164