Literature DB >> 15721181

Manual and hemispheric asymmetries in the execution of actual and pantomimed prehension.

Kerstin Laimgruber1, Georg Goldenberg, Joachim Hermsdörfer.   

Abstract

Impairments of the ipsilesional hand after brain damage have been reported in goal-directed motor acts and in pantomimes; the relationship between both movement conditions is largely unknown. In the presented study, pantomimed and actual prehension was examined in 29 stroke patients with left brain damage (LBD) or right brain damage (RBD) as well as in 21 control subjects. Kinematic analyses revealed various performance differences between the conditions of movement execution and the subject groups. The differences depended on the hand tested and on the side of the brain lesion. During actual prehension deviations from normal performance were obvious in the peak velocity of the transport component of the movement, which was reduced in RBD patients, and in the duration of the final adjustment phase, which was prolonged in both patient groups. Pantomime changed various features of movement execution. The transport component was particularly altered in the groups performing with the right hand. Hand aperture was significantly smaller during pantomime than during actual movement execution in all groups. However, this effect was particularly obvious in LBD patients, in whom the hand aperture was even completely absent during many of their pantomimes. Actual movement execution immediately preceding the pantomimes did not change the characteristic features of pantomimes. Thus, the cerebral processes for actually executed and pantomimed motor acts differ. Actual movements seem to be governed by external affordances and constraints; whereas, pantomimes may represent a symbolic act. During prehension, differences in grip formation reveal most directly this dichotomy. We argue that the left hemisphere plays a special role in the generation of the symbolic act; a lesion may abolish grip formation and causes the clinical symptom of apraxia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721181     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  22 in total

1.  Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right- and left-handedness: same pattern, different strength.

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Frederic Acke; Ann-Sofie Alderweireldt; Jo Nys; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Online processing of shape information for control of grasping.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Both hands at work: the effect of aging on upper-limb kinematics in a multi-step activity of daily living.

Authors:  Philipp Gulde; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hand shape selection in pantomimed grasping: interaction between the dorsal and the ventral visual streams and convergence on the ventral premotor area.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Yoshiaki Someya; Seiji Ogawa; Yoshihiro Takayama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Two action systems in the human brain.

Authors:  Ferdinand Binkofski; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Jennifer Randerath
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

7.  Tool use without a tool: kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Leif Johannsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Evidence for context sensitivity of grasp representations in human parietal and premotor cortices.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Stéphane Jacobs; Scott H Frey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The role of conflict, feedback, and action comprehension in monitoring of action errors: Evidence for internal and external routes.

Authors:  Cortney M Howard; Louisa L Smith; H Branch Coslett; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Memory for pantomimed actions versus actions with real objects.

Authors:  Ava J Senkfor
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.