Literature DB >> 15721035

A dynamic model of mouth closing movements in clariid catfishes: the role of enlarged jaw adductors.

Sam Van Wassenbergh1, Peter Aerts, Dominique Adriaens, Anthony Herrel.   

Abstract

Some species of Clariidae (air breathing catfishes) have extremely large (hypertrophied) jaw closure muscles. Besides producing higher bite forces, the enlarged muscles may also cause higher accelerations of the lower jaw during rapid mouth closure. Thus, jaw adductor hypertrophy could potentially also enable faster mouth closure. In this study, a forward dynamic model of jaw closing is developed to evaluate the importance of jaw adductor hypertrophy on the speed of mouth closure. The model includes inertia, pressure, tissue resistance and hydrodynamic drag forces on the lower jaw, which is modelled as a rotating half-ellipse. Simulations are run for four clariid species showing a gradual increase in jaw adductor hypertrophy (Clarias gariepinus, Clariallabes longicauda, Gymnallabes typus and Channallabes apus). The model was validated using data from high-speed videos of prey captures in these species. In general, the kinematic profiles of the fastest mouth closure from each species are reasonably well predicted by the model. The model was also used to compare the four species during standardized mouth closures (same initial gape angle, travel distance and cranial size). These simulations suggest that the species with enlarged jaw adductors have an increased speed of jaw closure (in comparison with the non-hypertrophied C. gariepinus) for short lower jaw rotations and when feeding at high gape angles. Consequently, the jaw system in these species seems well equipped to capture relatively large, evasive prey. For prey captures during which the lower jaw rotates freely over a larger distance before impacting the prey, the higher kinematic efficiency of the C. gariepinus jaw system results in the fastest jaw closures. In all cases, the model predicts that an increase in the physiological cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles does indeed contribute to the speed of jaw closure in clariid fish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15721035     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  5 in total

1.  Swimming muscles power suction feeding in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Thomas J Roberts; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Four-bar linkage modelling in teleost pharyngeal jaws: computer simulations of bite kinetics.

Authors:  Justin R Grubich; Mark W Westneat
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A digital dissection of two teleost fishes: comparative functional anatomy of the cranial musculoskeletal system in pike (Esox lucius) and eel (Anguilla anguilla).

Authors:  Robert Brocklehurst; Laura Porro; Anthony Herrel; Dominique Adriaens; Emily Rayfield
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Jaw-muscle fiber architecture in tufted capuchins favors generating relatively large muscle forces without compromising jaw gape.

Authors:  Andrea B Taylor; Christopher J Vinyard
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  Increasing morphological disparity and decreasing optimality for jaw speed and strength during the radiation of jawed vertebrates.

Authors:  William J Deakin; Philip S L Anderson; Wendy den Boer; Thomas J Smith; Jennifer J Hill; Martin Rücklin; Philip C J Donoghue; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.