Literature DB >> 1572042

Synchronized repolarization after defibrillation shocks. A possible component of the defibrillation process demonstrated by optical recordings in rabbit heart.

S M Dillon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is currently believed that defibrillation shocks act primarily by stimulating excitable myocardium to abolish wave fronts. Recent studies have shown that shocks applied during pacing not only stimulate excitable myocardium but also prolong the depolarization and refractoriness of myocardium already in a depolarized state. This study investigates the effects of shocks on fibrillation action potentials. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Recordings of membrane action potentials free of shock artifact were obtained using the voltage-sensitive dye WW781 during defibrillation of isolated rabbit hearts. These records showed that the shocks caused an additional phase of depolarization beginning with an initial rapid depolarization of the optical signal followed by a slow phase of repolarization. This occurred throughout all phases of the fibrillation action potential from just after completion of the upstroke to a time of near maximal repolarization. Defibrillation shocks, however, had the additional effect of causing the myocardium to repolarize at a constant time after the shock regardless of its prior electrical activity--the constant repolarization time response. This effect was not dependent on the presence of D600 (methoxyverapamil) or continuous coronary perfusion. It was accompanied by a similar constancy in the return of myocardial excitability. Recordings taken from multiple adjacent recording sites also showed a constant repolarization time among them.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple model of reentry is used to illustrate how the constant repolarization response, in addition to wave front termination and refractoriness extension, could play a role in the successful termination of fibrillation by electrical shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1572042     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.85.5.1865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  8 in total

1.  Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks.

Authors:  D M Clark; A E Pollard; R E Ideker; S B Knisley
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Spatial distribution of cardiac transmembrane potentials around an extracellular electrode: dependence on fiber orientation.

Authors:  M Neunlist; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A generalized activating function for predicting virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  E A Sobie; R C Susil; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Optical multisite monitoring of cell excitation phenomena in isolated cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  H Windisch; H Ahammer; P Schaffer; W Müller; D Platzer
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Factors determining spontaneous ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  N Tribulova; M Manoach
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001

7.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

Review 8.  Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review.

Authors:  Skylar Buchan; Ronit Kar; Mathews John; Allison Post; Mehdi Razavi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.727

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.