Literature DB >> 15720354

Laparoscopic or trephine faecal diversion: is there a preferred approach and why?

S Jugool1, E S McKain, K Swarnkar, K D Vellacott, B M Stephenson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Faecal diversion is often indicated in perineal sepsis and in the palliation of advanced ano-rectal malignancy. This can be performed open or laparoscopically. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of these two approaches to stoma creation.
METHODS: Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic or 'trephine' stoma creation in 49 consecutive unselected patients.
RESULTS: Eighteen (37%) patients (median age 68 years) underwent a laparoscopic approach in which there were no conversions. One patient required a laparotomy for stoma mal-orientation and there were two (11%) deaths. Thirty-one patients (median age 70 years) had a trephine stoma formed with two (6%) conversions but no deaths. Thirteen (42%) of these patients had surgery performed under regional anaesthesia. There was no difference in the hospital stay between the two groups and at a mean follow-up of 16 months, 20 (41%) patients had died mainly from disease progression.
CONCLUSION: Both approaches to faecal diversion give adequate results in the short term. Laparoscopic techniques should be reserved for fitter patients as a trephine stoma can be performed under regional anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15720354     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00730.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive stomas.

Authors:  Michael D Hellinger; Abdullah Al Haddad
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

2.  Palliative laparoscopic end colostomy in a nonagenarian.

Authors:  Lisa A Dos Santos; Brian M Slomovitz; Marilyn Huang; Kevin Holcomb; Pedro T Ramirez; Thomas A Caputo
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.