Literature DB >> 15718862

Reduced medication dependency and improved symptoms and quality of life 12 months after enteryx implantation for gastroesophageal reflux.

Brigitte Schumacher1, Horst Neuhaus, Marianne Ortner, René Laugier, Martin Benson, Jean Boyer, Thierry Ponchon, Friedrich Hagenmüller, Jean-Charles Grimaud, Patrick Rampal, Jean-François Rey, Karl-Hermann Fuchs, Hans-Peter Allgaier, Jürgen Hochberger, Hubert J Stein, Juan Andrés Ramírez Armengol, Peter D Siersema, Jacques Devière.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need is well recognized for additional data on endoluminal therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This prospective multicenter clinical trial was designed to assess safety and effectiveness of Enteryx, a nonresorbable copolymer implanted into the lower esophagus, in reducing usage of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and improving reflux symptoms and quality of life.
METHODS: Enteryx implantation was performed under fluoroscopic visualization without general anesthesia in 93 patients with symptomatic GERD responsive to and relapsing upon cessation of PPI therapy. Subjective and objective data were collected up to 12 months postprocedure. The criterion for treatment success was reduction in PPI dosage of > or =50%.
RESULTS: At 12 months, treatment success was attained in 86% (confidence interval, 77%-93%) of 74 evaluable patients and elimination of PPI therapy in 65% (confidence interval, 53%-76%). The treatment success rate by intent-to-treat analysis was 69% (confidence interval, 58%-78%). Reflux-related heartburn (P < 0.0001), regurgitation symptoms (P = 0.0005), and physical (P < 0.0001) and mental quality of life (P = 0.0012) scores improved. The most frequent complications were chest pain (77%), dysphagia/odynophagia (27%), and sensation of fever (26%).
CONCLUSIONS: Enteryx implantation provides an effective and safe alternative for management of gastroesophageal reflux, reducing medication dependency and symptoms and enhancing quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15718862     DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000152751.10268.fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  4 in total

Review 1.  Endolumenal therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: are they dead?

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Karl Hermann Fuchs; Benjamin Babic; Wolfram Breithaupt; Bernard Dallemagne; Abe Fingerhut; Edgar Furnee; Frank Granderath; Peter Horvath; Peter Kardos; Rudolph Pointner; Edoardo Savarino; Maud Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom; Giovanni Zaninotto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Reflux and hiatus hernia in the controversy between conservative and operative therapy].

Authors:  S M Freys; J Heimbucher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Do endoscopic antireflux procedures fit in the current treatment paradigm of gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Kumar Krishnan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 11.382

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.