Literature DB >> 15718698

Determining the efficacy of an immersive trainer for arthroscopy skills.

James P Bliss1, Hope S Hanner-Bailey, Mark W Scerbo.   

Abstract

The present study examined the effectiveness of an immersive arthroscopic simulator for training naive participants to identify major anatomical structures and manipulate the arthroscope and probe. Ten psychology graduate students engaged in five consecutive days of practice sessions with the arthroscopic trainer. Following each session, participants were tested to see how quickly and accurately they could identify 10 anatomical landmarks and manipulate the arthroscope and probe. The results demonstrated steady learning on both tasks. For the anatomy task, participants correctly identified an average of 7.7 out of 10 structures correctly in the first session and 9.5 in the last. During the manipulation task, participants collided 53.5 times with simulated tissues in the first session and 13.2 times during the final session. Participants (n=9) also demonstrated minimal performance degradation when tested 4 weeks later. These data suggest that the immersive arthroscopic trainer might be useful as an initial screening or training tool for beginning medical students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15718698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  11 in total

Review 1.  Virtual reality in orthopaedics: is it a reality?

Authors:  Jay D Mabrey; Karl D Reinig; W Dilworth Cannon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Haptic feedback can provide an objective assessment of arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  George Chami; James W Ward; Roger Phillips; Kevin P Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The role of simulation in developing surgical skills.

Authors:  K S N Akhtar; Alvin Chen; N J Standfield; C M Gupte
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Lan Li; Fei Yu; Dongquan Shi; Jianping Shi; Zongjun Tian; Jiquan Yang; Xingsong Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  First validation of the PASSPORT training environment for arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  Gabriëlle J M Tuijthof; Maayke N van Sterkenburg; Inger N Sierevelt; Jakob van Oldenrijk; C Niek Van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Does perception of usefulness of arthroscopic simulators differ with levels of experience?

Authors:  Gabriëlle J M Tuijthof; P Visser; Inger N Sierevelt; C Niek Van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Development of simulated arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  Christine Andersen; Trine N Winding; Martin S Vesterby
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  The learning curves of a validated virtual reality hip arthroscopy simulator.

Authors:  Jonathan D Bartlett; John E Lawrence; Matthew Yan; Borna Guevel; Max E Stewart; Emmanuel Audenaert; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Arthroscopy or ultrasound in undergraduate anatomy education: a randomized cross-over controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; John Bennet Carow; Miriam Ruesseler; Benjamin Moritz Leu; Melanie Simon; Stefan K Beckers; Alireza Ghassemi; Tolga T Sönmez; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency.

Authors:  Justin L Hodgins; Christian Veillette
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.