Literature DB >> 1571829

An assessment of the prevalence of organic material on bone surfaces.

J Chow1, T J Chambers.   

Abstract

Although an unmineralized layer of organic material has been identified on both bone-forming surfaces and surfaces upon which bone formation has ceased (quiescent surfaces), the proportion of bone surfaces that is covered by unmineralized material has not been quantified. Because the unmineralized layer may play a role in the regulation of bone resorption, we undertook a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) assessment to determine its extent. Specimens of adult human ribs were prepared for undecalcified resin sections and SEM. For SEM, cells were removed and the bone surface was inspected and photographed. The same specimen was then immersed in NaOCl to remove organic material, and inspected again in the SEM. We found that the surface of bone appeared quite different before, compared to after, removal of organic material. Before removal, the entire nonresorptive surface was finely fibrillary. After removal of the organic material we observed a minor component showing the finely nodular surface typical of mineralizing bone, and a major component in which the mineral surface was free of such nodules. In only 3 of 1,200 photographs did we identify areas in which the bone surface was not altered by removal of organic material from the specimen. Analysis of histological sections of the ribs showed that approximately 85% of the bone surface was classifiable by light microscopy as quiescent. These results suggest that not only formative but also quiescent surfaces are covered by a layer of unmineralized organic material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1571829     DOI: 10.1007/bf00298787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  12 in total

Review 1.  The bone lining cell: a distinct phenotype?

Authors:  S C Miller; W S Jee
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Bone lining cells: structure and function.

Authors:  S C Miller; L de Saint-Georges; B M Bowman; W S Jee
Journal:  Scanning Microsc       Date:  1989-09

3.  The lamina limitans of the organic matrix of calcified cartilage and bone.

Authors:  J P Scherft
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1972-02

4.  The ultrastructure of endosteum: a topographic study in young adult rabbits.

Authors:  S C Luk; C Nopajaroonsri; G T Simon
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1974-02

5.  Scanning electron microscopy of lamellar bone.

Authors:  A Boyde; M H Hordell
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1969

6.  Osteoid: an ultrastructural study.

Authors:  V L Fornasier
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  The cellular basis of bone remodeling: the quantum concept reexamined in light of recent advances in the cell biology of bone.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Characterization of endosteal bone-lining cells from fatty marrow bone sites in adult beagles.

Authors:  S C Miller; B M Bowman; J M Smith; W S Jee
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1980-10

9.  Mammalian collagenase predisposes bone surfaces to osteoclastic resorption.

Authors:  T J Chambers; J A Darby; K Fuller
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Bone cells predispose bone surfaces to resorption by exposure of mineral to osteoclastic contact.

Authors:  T J Chambers; K Fuller
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  2 in total

1.  OSCAR is a collagen receptor that costimulates osteoclastogenesis in DAP12-deficient humans and mice.

Authors:  Alexander David Barrow; Nicolas Raynal; Thomas Levin Andersen; David A Slatter; Dominique Bihan; Nicholas Pugh; Marina Cella; Taesoo Kim; Jaerang Rho; Takako Negishi-Koga; Jean-Marie Delaisse; Hiroshi Takayanagi; Joseph Lorenzo; Marco Colonna; Richard W Farndale; Yongwon Choi; John Trowsdale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates survival and chemotactic behavior in isolated osteoclasts.

Authors:  K Fuller; J M Owens; C J Jagger; A Wilson; R Moss; T J Chambers
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.