Literature DB >> 1571796

Artificial lighting in poultry houses: do hens perceive the modulation of fluorescent lamps as flicker?

J F Nuboer1, M A Coemans, J J Vos.   

Abstract

1. Many poultry houses are illuminated by fluorescent lamps which produce discontinuous illumination with a frequency of either 100 or 120 Hz. 2. This study investigated whether domestic fowls perceive this discontinuity as flicker by training two Leghorn hens to choose between a continuous and a discontinuous light, all other variables being identical. 3. The light-stimulus was either monochromatic with 100% sinusoidal modulation or a fluorescent lamp whose modulation frequency could be electrically adjusted. 4. Each (correct) choice for the discontinuous light was followed by a 5 Hz higher frequency, whereas an incorrect choice was followed by a 10 Hz lower frequency. 5. On the basis of this principle the animals themselves established the highest perceivable frequency of the discontinuous light, called the Critical Fusion Frequency (CFF), that they could discriminate from continuous light. 6. These frequencies typically depend on the stimulus intensity increasing with increasing intensities, until a maximum value is reached. 7. Two factors limited the magnitudes of the CFF's that were recorded: the maximum stimulus intensities produced and variability in the chicken's response ("behavioural noise"). In spite of these constraints 105 Hz was established as the maximum CFF. 8. On the basis of extrapolation it is concluded that the direct light from fluorescent lamps driven by 50 Hz alternating current is seen by the chicken as flickering. 9. The results justify large-scale comparison of behaviour and production in poultry houses that are illuminated either by low-frequency or by high-frequency fluorescent lamps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1571796     DOI: 10.1080/00071669208417449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  9 in total

1.  The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli.

Authors:  Emma Ware; Daniel R Saunders; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.422

2.  The flicker fusion frequency of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) revisited.

Authors:  Jannika E Boström; Nicola K Haller; Marina Dimitrova; Anders Ödeen; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Symmetry recognition by pigeons: Generalized or not?

Authors:  Juan D Delius; Julia A M Delius; Jennifer M Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Light Color and the Commercial Broiler: Effect on Ocular Health and Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Bruna Remonato Franco; Marina L Leis; Melody Wong; Tory Shynkaruk; Trever Crowe; Bryan Fancher; Nick French; Scot Gillingham; Karen Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Effects of blue-green LED lights with two perceived illuminance (human and poultry) on immune performance and skeletal development of layer chickens.

Authors:  Yongxiang Wei; Weichao Zheng; Qin Tong; Zonggang Li; Baoming Li; Haipeng Shi; Yuxin Wang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Driving singing behaviour in songbirds using a multi-modal, multi-agent virtual environment.

Authors:  Leon Bonde Larsen; Iris Adam; Gordon J Berman; John Hallam; Coen P H Elemans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light.

Authors:  Richard Inger; Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ultra-Rapid Vision in Birds.

Authors:  Jannika E Boström; Marina Dimitrova; Cindy Canton; Olle Håstad; Anna Qvarnström; Anders Ödeen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.