Literature DB >> 1571752

Moclobemide versus clomipramine in endogenous depression. A double-blind randomised clinical trial.

J D Guelfi1, C Payan, J Fermanian, A M Pedarriosse, R Manfredi.   

Abstract

The effects of moclobemide (300-600 mg/day), a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor - A (MAOI-A), were compared in a double-blind, multi-centre trial with those of clomipramine (100-200 mg/day) on 129 in-patients suffering from endogenous depression (according to ICD-9 and the Newcastle Scale). No significant differences in efficacy were seen between the two treatment groups. In the moclobemide group the mean scores on the MADRS were 36.4 on day 0 and 13.2 on day 42 (end-point analysis); scores were 37.4 and 10.9 respectively in the clomipramine group. An earlier onset of antidepressant activity was noted for moclobemide. Tolerability was significantly better for moclobemide, as shown by the Clinical Global Impression of Tolerance (CGIT). Anticholinergic effects, weight gain and orthostatic hypotension were more frequent in the clomipramine group. No biological treatment-related changes were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1571752     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.160.4.519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  6 in total

1.  What proportion of primary psychiatric interventions are based on evidence from randomised controlled trials?

Authors:  J R Geddes; D Game; N E Jenkins; L A Peterson; G R Pottinger; D L Sackett
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

2.  Moclobemide versus fluoxetine for a major depressive episode.

Authors:  C Reynaert; M Parent; J Mirel; P Janne; L Haazen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Efficacy of moclobemide in different patient groups: a meta-analysis of studies.

Authors:  J Angst; M Stabl
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Risk-benefit assessment of newer versus older monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors.

Authors:  Y Lecrubier
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Comparative tolerability profiles of the newer versus older antidepressants.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer; H K Manji; W Z Potter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Effect of five-consecutive-day exposure to an anxiogenic stressor on sleep-wake activity in rats.

Authors:  Matthew W O'Malley; Rachel Lea Fishman; Domenic A Ciraulo; Subimal Datta
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.