Literature DB >> 15716322

Referrals to hospital-based rheumatology and orthopaedic services: seeking direction.

C A Speed1, A J Crisp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: While both community and hospital-based services strive to cope with the considerable burden posed by musculoskeletal disorders, multidisciplinary-led, integrated approaches are frequently lacking. It has been suggested that referrals to musculoskeletal services are frequently misdirected to an orthopaedic surgeon when non-surgical advice/intervention is warranted, reducing the efficiency of hospital-based services and potentially affecting quality of care. Triage of referrals may help to prevent this, but this system is dependent upon accurate and thorough information being provided in the referral letter. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of triage of musculoskeletal referrals to rheumatology and orthopaedic services at a large teaching hospital.
METHODS: One thousand and eighty-seven consecutive referral letters to orthopaedic and rheumatology services were reviewed by a consultant rheumatologist. Letters were assessed for both basic content and the appropriate destination for that referral. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the assessor's prediction of the most appropriate destination of the referrals, the number of patients who were ultimately listed for surgical intervention was calculated in a random sample of orthopaedic referrals, 1 yr after the initial hospital appointment was requested.
RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty-two referrals were to orthopaedics and 393 to rheumatology. Referrals relating to spinal pain were excluded. The content of letters was scant and no diagnosis was volunteered in 63.4% of referrals. Fifty-eight per cent of referrals to orthopaedics were considered appropriate; 27% of referrals to orthopaedics were defined as 'should definitely see a rheumatologist' (12%) or 'should probably see a rheumatologist' (15%). Fifteen per cent of referrals to orthopaedics were defined as 'could see either a surgeon or a rheumatologist'. Ninety-four per cent of referrals to rheumatology were defined as appropriate, 2% were not and 4% were defined as 'could see either a surgeon or a rheumatologist'. One year later, in a random sample of 373 of the orthopaedic referrals, 42.2% of those who were categorized as 'should see surgeon' and 9.7% of the 'should see a physician' group were listed for surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Many referrals to hospital-based musculoskeletal services are likely to be misdirected. Integrated referral and care pathways are required for efficient and optimal care of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. The development of such pathways will require significant support, education and training for general practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15716322     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  22 in total

1.  Physiological referrals for paediatric musculoskeletal complaints: A costly problem that needs to be addressed.

Authors:  Alberto Carli; Neil Saran; Jan Kruijt; Norine Alam; Reggie Hamdy
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  The value of referral letter information in predicting inflammatory arthritis--factors important for effective triaging.

Authors:  Sen Hee Tay; Anita Y N Lim; Tung Lin Lee; Bernadette P L Low; Peter P Cheung
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Orthopaedic triage at a physiotherapist-led 'Musculoskeletal Assessment Clinic': a seven-month service evaluation of outcomes.

Authors:  S O'Farrell; K M Smart; A Caffrey; O Daly; C Doody
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  The Staffordshire arthritis, musculoskeletal, and back assessment (SAMBA) study: a prospective observational study of patient outcome following referral to a primary-secondary care musculoskeletal interface service.

Authors:  Edward Roddy; Irena Zwierska; Peter Dawes; Samantha L Hider; Kelvin P Jordan; Jon Packham; Kay Stevenson; Elaine Hay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Christopher B Forrest; Caroline Y Lin
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Inpatient consultations to an orthopaedic service: the hidden workload.

Authors:  N T O'Malley; B O'Daly; J A Harty; W Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Priority-setting tools for rheumatology disease referrals: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Carolyn De Coster; Avril Fitzgerald; Monica Cepoiu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Do referral-management schemes reduce hospital outpatient attendances? Time-series evaluation of primary care referral management.

Authors:  Jonathan Ms Cox; Nicholas Steel; Allan B Clark; Bharathy Kumaravel; Max O Bachmann
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Profiling the patients visiting the emergency room for musculoskeletal complaints: characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  Mattia Bellan; Rossella Molinari; Luigi Castello; Daniele Sola; Antonello Gibbin; Giulia Guaschino; Roberta Pedrazzoli; Alessia Puma; Mario Pirisi; Gian Carlo Avanzi; Pier Paolo Sainaghi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  General practitioner management of shoulder pain in comparison with rheumatologist expectation of care and best evidence: an Australian national survey.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Margaret P Staples; E Michael Shanahan; Juliana F Roos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.