Literature DB >> 15716164

Internally generated and directly cued task sets: an investigation with fMRI.

Birte U Forstmann1, Marcel Brass, Iring Koch, D Yves von Cramon.   

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a major role for goal-directed behaviour. In this context it is usually necessary to coordinate environmental information and internally represented intentions. Such goal-directed "endogenous control processes" can be investigated with the task-switching paradigm in which participants are required to alternate between different tasks. In the present study, we aimed at investigating different degrees of endogenous control by introducing two cue types with varying directness of the cue-task association. The "transition cues" informed the participants about repeating or switching the task but not about the task identity. Contrary to that, the "task cues" were directly associated with the upcoming task set. Since the transition cues are not directly associated with the task set they should require a higher demand of endogenous control than the task cues. The comparison of both cue types revealed frontolateral as well as frontomedian activations for the transition cue. We assume that the frontolateral activation reflects the coordination of information within working memory (WM) and the frontomedian cortex reflects the higher demand for endogenous control. Furthermore, regions of interest (ROIs) analyses indicate an important role for anterior regions along the left inferior frontal sulcus and frontomedian wall. This is suggested to reflect a functional gradient in anterior-posterior direction which is linked to the relative degree of required endogenous control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15716164     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  28 in total

Review 1.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The influence of rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on intentional set switching.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Rudi De Raedt; Chris Baeken; Lemke Leyman; Hugo D'haenen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  H A Slagter; D H Weissman; B Giesbrecht; J L Kenemans; G R Mangun; A Kok; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Model-based clustering of meta-analytic functional imaging data.

Authors:  Jane Neumann; D Yves von Cramon; Gabriele Lohmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  At your own peril: an ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex.

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Jochen Kaiser; Christoph Bledowski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Becoming self-directed: abstract representations support endogenous flexibility in children.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-15

7.  Verbal representation in task order control: an examination with transition and task cues in random task switching.

Authors:  Erina Saeki; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

8.  Neural correlates for task switching in the macaque superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jason L Chan; Michael J Koval; Kevin Johnston; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The representation of abstract task rules in the human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sara L Bengtsson; John-Dylan Haynes; Katsuyuki Sakai; Mark J Buckley; Richard E Passingham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Evaluating self-generated decisions in frontal pole cortex of monkeys.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsujimoto; Aldo Genovesio; Steven P Wise
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.